Whole Blood Volume-Based Absolute Quantification of HTLV-1 Proviral Load: A Comparative Method Evaluation Study

The proviral load of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is an important biomarker associated with the monitoring and risk stratification of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) and HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP). However, the lack of standardized quantification methods limits its broader application. This study evaluated a novel absolute quantification approach based on whole blood volume and compared its performance with established protocols. A total of 66 HTLV-1-infected individuals were analyzed using six qPCR-based methodologies, including volumetric quantification (copies/µL) by absolute quantification and the Tamegão-Lopes method, as well as normalization per 1000 cells (whole blood, buffy coat, PBMCs, and CD4+ T cells). Association and agreement were assessed using Pearson’s correlation, Bland–Altman analysis, concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs), and Deming regression. Absolute quantification showed strong correlation with both the Tamegão-Lopes method and CD4+-based quantification (r = 0.93 and 0.84, respectively; p < 0.001) and high agreement (CCC = 0.866 and 0.811, respectively), with modest systematic bias (−0.273 log10 copies/µL and 0.115 log10 copies/103 cells, respectively). Leukocyte-normalized methods showed greater discrepancies, likely due to dilution by uninfected cells. These findings show that quantification based on total blood volume is a simplified, operationally feasible alternative for assessing HTLV-1 proviral load.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Viruses
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/v18050580
Primary Topic
T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whole Blood Volume-Based Absolute Quantification of HTLV-1 Proviral Load: A Comparative Method Evaluation Study

Gabriel Franco, Andreas Stöcker, E Martins Netto, Carlos Brites et al.
Viruses
T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
article

Whole Blood Volume-Based Absolute Quantification of HTLV-1 Proviral Load: A Comparative Method Evaluation Study

Gabriel Franco, Andreas Stöcker, E Martins Netto, Carlos Brites, Heliene Pereira
article en

Abstract

The proviral load of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is an important biomarker associated with the monitoring and risk stratification of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) and HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP). However, the lack of standardized quantification methods limits its broader application. This study evaluated a novel absolute quantification approach based on whole blood volume and compared its performance with established protocols. A total of 66 HTLV-1-infected individuals were analyzed using six qPCR-based methodologies, including volumetric quantification (copies/µL) by absolute quantification and the Tamegão-Lopes method, as well as normalization per 1000 cells (whole blood, buffy coat, PBMCs, and CD4+ T cells). Association and agreement were assessed using Pearson’s correlation, Bland–Altman analysis, concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs), and Deming regression. Absolute quantification showed strong correlation with both the Tamegão-Lopes method and CD4+-based quantification (r = 0.93 and 0.84, respectively; p < 0.001) and high agreement (CCC = 0.866 and 0.811, respectively), with modest systematic bias (−0.273 log10 copies/µL and 0.115 log10 copies/103 cells, respectively). Leukocyte-normalized methods showed greater discrepancies, likely due to dilution by uninfected cells. These findings show that quantification based on total blood volume is a simplified, operationally feasible alternative for assessing HTLV-1 proviral load.

VirusesVol. 18(5)
Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), Complexo Hospitalar Universitário Professor Edgard Santos (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.