Supervisors’ Role in Mitigating Coworker Incivility: Implications for Workplace Ethics

Abstract Drawing on cognitive appraisal theory and an appraisal perspective of justice, this study investigates how and when coworker incivility impairs employee psychological well-being. We propose and test a moderated mediation model where perceived job stress mediates the negative effect of coworker incivility on psychological well-being, and this indirect effect is buffered by supervisor interpersonal justice. We tested our model across three studies: a three-wave survey establishing mediation (Study 1; N = 144), a cross-sectional field study of the full moderated mediation model (Study 2; N = 172), and a vignette experiment establishing causality (Study 3; N = 225). Results consistently showed that coworker incivility diminishes psychological well-being by increasing employees’ perceived job stress. Importantly, this indirect effect is attenuated when supervisors demonstrate high levels of interpersonal justice. This study expands the literature on workplace incivility and psychological well-being by empirically demonstrating that employees perceive their jobs as more stressful and experience poorer psychological well-being after interacting with uncivil coworkers; yet supervisors can play a critical role in mitigating these effects. Furthermore, we highlight the ethical implications by emphasizing the contingency effect of supervisors’ interpersonal justice in mitigating incivility and fostering an ethical workplace for all employees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-026-06346-0
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supervisors’ Role in Mitigating Coworker Incivility: Implications for Workplace Ethics

Muhammad Sarfraz, William Y. Degbey, Yasir Mansoor Kundi, Benjamin Laker et al.
Journal of Business Ethics
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Supervisors’ Role in Mitigating Coworker Incivility: Implications for Workplace Ethics

Muhammad Sarfraz, William Y. Degbey, Yasir Mansoor Kundi, Benjamin Laker, Muhammad Sufyan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on cognitive appraisal theory and an appraisal perspective of justice, this study investigates how and when coworker incivility impairs employee psychological well-being. We propose and test a moderated mediation model where perceived job stress mediates the negative effect of coworker incivility on psychological well-being, and this indirect effect is buffered by supervisor interpersonal justice. We tested our model across three studies: a three-wave survey establishing mediation (Study 1; N = 144), a cross-sectional field study of the full moderated mediation model (Study 2; N = 172), and a vignette experiment establishing causality (Study 3; N = 225). Results consistently showed that coworker incivility diminishes psychological well-being by increasing employees’ perceived job stress. Importantly, this indirect effect is attenuated when supervisors demonstrate high levels of interpersonal justice. This study expands the literature on workplace incivility and psychological well-being by empirically demonstrating that employees perceive their jobs as more stressful and experience poorer psychological well-being after interacting with uncivil coworkers; yet supervisors can play a critical role in mitigating these effects. Furthermore, we highlight the ethical implications by emphasizing the contingency effect of supervisors’ interpersonal justice in mitigating incivility and fostering an ethical workplace for all employees.

Journal of Business Ethics
Institute of Business Administration Karachi (PK), University of Reading (GB), University of Vaasa (FI), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Vaasan yliopisto
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.