Toward a More Sustainable Pavement Preservation: Development and Evaluation of 100% RAP Microsurfacing Mixtures

Asphalt pavements undergo several distresses such as rutting and fatigue cracking under the influence of coupled effects of traffic and environmental loads. Use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) material into preservation treatments such as microsurfacing offers both economic and environmental benefits by ensuring natural resource conservation and cost savings with similar performance. The current research study emphasized utilizing 100% RAP material as a potential substitute for the virgin aggregates in microsurfacing. The study included laboratory investigations, construction of pavement test sections at New Jersey, monitoring the short-term performance, and conducting a performance-cost based comparison analysis. Results indicated that RAP can be used as a potential substitute to produce microsurfacing mixtures. RAP microsurfacing mixtures required 15% to 20% more water to achieve similar workability due to hydrophobic nature of RAP. Wet track abrasion test (WTAT) results showed enhanced abrasion resistance (22–28%) of RAP microsurfacing including partial RAP activation study. This phenomenon is also clearly visible through better rutting characteristics where RAP microsurfacing mixes exhibited 18%–25% lower lateral displacement values. Construction experience of virgin and RAP microsurfacing displayed an even, and consistent RAP mixture with no segregation of RAP particles. All the distress surveys conducted by research teams on pavement sections showed that RAP microsurfacing showed an equivalent performance compared to virgin microsurfacing. A cost difference of USD 38 per ton was observed for RAP microsurfacing compared to virgin microsurfacing which is around 11%. Performance and cost based relative comparison was found to be 94.5% and 99.3% for virgin and RAP microsurfacing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-22741
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a More Sustainable Pavement Preservation: Development and Evaluation of 100% RAP Microsurfacing Mixtures

Yusuf Mehta, Arunkumar Goli, Ayman Ali
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Toward a More Sustainable Pavement Preservation: Development and Evaluation of 100% RAP Microsurfacing Mixtures

Yusuf Mehta, Arunkumar Goli, Ayman Ali
article en

Abstract

Asphalt pavements undergo several distresses such as rutting and fatigue cracking under the influence of coupled effects of traffic and environmental loads. Use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) material into preservation treatments such as microsurfacing offers both economic and environmental benefits by ensuring natural resource conservation and cost savings with similar performance. The current research study emphasized utilizing 100% RAP material as a potential substitute for the virgin aggregates in microsurfacing. The study included laboratory investigations, construction of pavement test sections at New Jersey, monitoring the short-term performance, and conducting a performance-cost based comparison analysis. Results indicated that RAP can be used as a potential substitute to produce microsurfacing mixtures. RAP microsurfacing mixtures required 15% to 20% more water to achieve similar workability due to hydrophobic nature of RAP. Wet track abrasion test (WTAT) results showed enhanced abrasion resistance (22–28%) of RAP microsurfacing including partial RAP activation study. This phenomenon is also clearly visible through better rutting characteristics where RAP microsurfacing mixes exhibited 18%–25% lower lateral displacement values. Construction experience of virgin and RAP microsurfacing displayed an even, and consistent RAP mixture with no segregation of RAP particles. All the distress surveys conducted by research teams on pavement sections showed that RAP microsurfacing showed an equivalent performance compared to virgin microsurfacing. A cost difference of USD 38 per ton was observed for RAP microsurfacing compared to virgin microsurfacing which is around 11%. Performance and cost based relative comparison was found to be 94.5% and 99.3% for virgin and RAP microsurfacing.

Journal of Materials in Civil EngineeringVol. 38(8)
Rowan University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.