Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients towards biosimilars in Singapore

ObjectiveBiosimilars offer a cost-effective alternative to biologics. Despite high (>95%) adoption in Singapore, gaps remain in healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and patients' knowledge and confidence. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions (KAP) of HCPs and patients regarding biosimilars in Singapore, identifying barriers and facilitators to their uptake.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among HCPs within SingHealth institutions and patients receiving biologic/biosimilar treatment at National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) from February to April 2025. Validated questionnaires were administered electronically, and data were analyzed using descriptive, bivariate and multivariate methods using IBM SPSS Statistics 30.0.ResultsA total of 111 HCPs and 202 patients were surveyed. HCPs demonstrated moderate knowledge (60.8%) and confidence (59%) but generally positive attitudes. Patients showed limited knowledge (15.7%), generally neutral attitudes, and low confidence (35%). Occupation was the strongest predictor of HCPs' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence, while higher education was associated with greater patient knowledge. HCPs confidence in efficacy was independently predicted by knowledge (aOR = 1.18), while confidence in safety was linked to attitudes (aOR = 1.34). For patients, higher knowledge correlated with greater safety confidence (p < 0.05).ConclusionInstitutional mandates ensure strong biosimilar adoption, yet HCPs require further education to strengthen foundational understanding. For patients, low awareness and confidence are key barriers. Enhancing education and capitalising on the high levels of trust in HCPs may support transparent and confident decision-making in biosimilar use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552261451878
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients towards biosimilars in Singapore

Jo Lene Leow, Felicia Ong, Hui Hui Rachael Faithful Tan, Lita Chew
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients towards biosimilars in Singapore

Jo Lene Leow, Felicia Ong, Hui Hui Rachael Faithful Tan, Lita Chew
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveBiosimilars offer a cost-effective alternative to biologics. Despite high (>95%) adoption in Singapore, gaps remain in healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and patients' knowledge and confidence. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes and perceptions (KAP) of HCPs and patients regarding biosimilars in Singapore, identifying barriers and facilitators to their uptake.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among HCPs within SingHealth institutions and patients receiving biologic/biosimilar treatment at National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) from February to April 2025. Validated questionnaires were administered electronically, and data were analyzed using descriptive, bivariate and multivariate methods using IBM SPSS Statistics 30.0.ResultsA total of 111 HCPs and 202 patients were surveyed. HCPs demonstrated moderate knowledge (60.8%) and confidence (59%) but generally positive attitudes. Patients showed limited knowledge (15.7%), generally neutral attitudes, and low confidence (35%). Occupation was the strongest predictor of HCPs' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence, while higher education was associated with greater patient knowledge. HCPs confidence in efficacy was independently predicted by knowledge (aOR = 1.18), while confidence in safety was linked to attitudes (aOR = 1.34). For patients, higher knowledge correlated with greater safety confidence (p < 0.05).ConclusionInstitutional mandates ensure strong biosimilar adoption, yet HCPs require further education to strengthen foundational understanding. For patients, low awareness and confidence are key barriers. Enhancing education and capitalising on the high levels of trust in HCPs may support transparent and confident decision-making in biosimilar use.

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
SingHealth (SG), National University of Singapore (SG), Health Sciences Authority (SG), Molina Center for Energy and the Environment (US), National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.