Inhibition of return mediates the relationship between openness to experience and visuospatial ability

Background Openness to experience—a core dimension of the Big Five personality framework—has been increasingly linked to cognitive functioning, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Visuospatial ability (VA), a key cognitive domain involved in perception, memory, and problem-solving, has shown associations with Openness in prior research. Inhibition of return (IOR), a bottom-up attentional mechanism that slows responses to recently examined locations to promote orienting toward new ones, may serve as a cognitive intermediary by optimizing how visual attention is dynamically allocated. Objective This study investigated whether IOR mediates the relationship between Openness and VA, offering new insights into personality-related differences in attentional processing. Methods A total of 290 healthy adults completed standardized assessments of personality traits (NEO-FFI), cognitive function (RBANS), and a MATLAB-based exogenous cueing paradigm to quantify IOR. △ LRT_s, a transformed metric representing IOR strength, was calculated as the response time difference between valid and invalid trials. Group comparisons, correlation analyses, and mediation models were conducted using SPSS and the PROCESS macro, controlling for age, gender, and education. Results Participants with high Openness scores demonstrated significantly higher VA and stronger IOR effects ( i.e. , larger △ LRT_s) than those with low Openness (both p < 0.001). Correlational analyses revealed positive associations among Openness, △ LRT_s, and VA. Mediation analysis confirmed that △ LRT_s partially mediated the relationship between Openness and VA (indirect effect: B = 0.058, 95% CI [0.011–0.120]), suggesting that IOR contributes to the visuospatial advantage observed in individuals high in Openness. Conclusions This study provides novel evidence that IOR serves as a mediating attentional mechanism linking Openness to enhanced visuospatial performance. These findings highlight the dynamic interaction between personality traits and low-level cognitive processes, suggesting that IOR may represent a neurocognitive pathway through which Openness facilitates efficient attentional allocation. The results have implications for understanding individual differences in cognitive functioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21199
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inhibition of return mediates the relationship between openness to experience and visuospatial ability

Mingkang Song, Hongxiao Jia, Hongpeng Lv, Zhiqing Dai et al.
PeerJ
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Inhibition of return mediates the relationship between openness to experience and visuospatial ability

Mingkang Song, Hongxiao Jia, Hongpeng Lv, Zhiqing Dai, Fei Teng, Yuhang Duan, Jin Lin
article en

Abstract

Background Openness to experience—a core dimension of the Big Five personality framework—has been increasingly linked to cognitive functioning, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Visuospatial ability (VA), a key cognitive domain involved in perception, memory, and problem-solving, has shown associations with Openness in prior research. Inhibition of return (IOR), a bottom-up attentional mechanism that slows responses to recently examined locations to promote orienting toward new ones, may serve as a cognitive intermediary by optimizing how visual attention is dynamically allocated. Objective This study investigated whether IOR mediates the relationship between Openness and VA, offering new insights into personality-related differences in attentional processing. Methods A total of 290 healthy adults completed standardized assessments of personality traits (NEO-FFI), cognitive function (RBANS), and a MATLAB-based exogenous cueing paradigm to quantify IOR. △ LRT_s, a transformed metric representing IOR strength, was calculated as the response time difference between valid and invalid trials. Group comparisons, correlation analyses, and mediation models were conducted using SPSS and the PROCESS macro, controlling for age, gender, and education. Results Participants with high Openness scores demonstrated significantly higher VA and stronger IOR effects ( i.e. , larger △ LRT_s) than those with low Openness (both p < 0.001). Correlational analyses revealed positive associations among Openness, △ LRT_s, and VA. Mediation analysis confirmed that △ LRT_s partially mediated the relationship between Openness and VA (indirect effect: B = 0.058, 95% CI [0.011–0.120]), suggesting that IOR contributes to the visuospatial advantage observed in individuals high in Openness. Conclusions This study provides novel evidence that IOR serves as a mediating attentional mechanism linking Openness to enhanced visuospatial performance. These findings highlight the dynamic interaction between personality traits and low-level cognitive processes, suggesting that IOR may represent a neurocognitive pathway through which Openness facilitates efficient attentional allocation. The results have implications for understanding individual differences in cognitive functioning.

PeerJVol. 14
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Beijing Anding Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.