Recurrence Patterns and Prognostic Determinants of Odontogenic Tumors Following Radical Surgical Management: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Odontogenic tumors exhibit a wide spectrum of biological behaviors ranging from indolent benign lesions to aggressive malignant neoplasms with significant recurrence potential. Despite advances in surgical management, recurrence remains a major clinical challenge, particularly in tumors with aggressive histology and large sizes. Identifying reliable clinicopathological predictors is essential for optimizing treatment strategies and improving long-term outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate recurrence patterns and recurrence-free survival in odontogenic tumors and to identify independent predictors of recurrence following radical surgical treatment. Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted using anonymized records of patients treated between January 2011 and December 2022. A total of 465 patients' records were screened, and 127 met the eligibility criteria. Data on demographic variables, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was tumor recurrence, and recurrence-free survival was analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (The R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), employing Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models. Results: Of 127 patients, 72 (56.6%) had benign tumors and 55 (43.4%) had malignant tumors. Recurrence occurred in 27 (21.26%) patients, with significantly higher rates in malignant tumors than in benign tumors (p < 0.001). The median time to recurrence was shorter for malignant tumors (18 months) than for benign tumors (32 months) (p < 0.001). Malignant tumor type (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.51), tumor size (HR = 1.29 per cm), lymph node metastasis (HR = 4.57), and positive surgical margins (HR = 9.62) were significant predictors (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that tumor type (odds ratio (OR) = 3.76), size (OR = 1.25), nodal status (OR = 4.41), and margin status (OR = 3.89) were independent predictors. Conclusion: Recurrence in odontogenic tumors is primarily determined by tumor aggressiveness and the adequacy of surgical clearance. Malignant tumors, larger sizes, nodal involvement, and inadequate margins significantly increase the risk of recurrence. Careful preoperative evaluation and appropriate surgical planning are critical for improving long-term outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109358
Primary Topic
Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recurrence Patterns and Prognostic Determinants of Odontogenic Tumors Following Radical Surgical Management: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Priyanka Jadhav, Manish Munjal, Pratyaksha Singh Panwar, Manish Kumar Chandraker et al.
Cureus
Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
article

Recurrence Patterns and Prognostic Determinants of Odontogenic Tumors Following Radical Surgical Management: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Priyanka Jadhav, Manish Munjal, Pratyaksha Singh Panwar, Manish Kumar Chandraker, Florence Priya, Mayur M Shingade
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Odontogenic tumors exhibit a wide spectrum of biological behaviors ranging from indolent benign lesions to aggressive malignant neoplasms with significant recurrence potential. Despite advances in surgical management, recurrence remains a major clinical challenge, particularly in tumors with aggressive histology and large sizes. Identifying reliable clinicopathological predictors is essential for optimizing treatment strategies and improving long-term outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate recurrence patterns and recurrence-free survival in odontogenic tumors and to identify independent predictors of recurrence following radical surgical treatment. Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted using anonymized records of patients treated between January 2011 and December 2022. A total of 465 patients' records were screened, and 127 met the eligibility criteria. Data on demographic variables, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was tumor recurrence, and recurrence-free survival was analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (The R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), employing Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models. Results: Of 127 patients, 72 (56.6%) had benign tumors and 55 (43.4%) had malignant tumors. Recurrence occurred in 27 (21.26%) patients, with significantly higher rates in malignant tumors than in benign tumors (p < 0.001). The median time to recurrence was shorter for malignant tumors (18 months) than for benign tumors (32 months) (p < 0.001). Malignant tumor type (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.51), tumor size (HR = 1.29 per cm), lymph node metastasis (HR = 4.57), and positive surgical margins (HR = 9.62) were significant predictors (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that tumor type (odds ratio (OR) = 3.76), size (OR = 1.25), nodal status (OR = 4.41), and margin status (OR = 3.89) were independent predictors. Conclusion: Recurrence in odontogenic tumors is primarily determined by tumor aggressiveness and the adequacy of surgical clearance. Malignant tumors, larger sizes, nodal involvement, and inadequate margins significantly increase the risk of recurrence. Careful preoperative evaluation and appropriate surgical planning are critical for improving long-term outcomes.

Cureus
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.