Towards an efficacy model of Peace Journalism: Engaged audience responses to Sport media in Israeli divided society from 2023 to 2024

This study proposes and applies an analytical framework of peace journalism (PJ) versus war journalism (WJ) in Israeli sport media during the 2023–2024 judicial reforms crisis and Israel-Hamas war. The framework operationalizes discursive impact through audience engagement (comment volume) and dominant sentiment (positive/cohesive, neutral/negotiated, negative/divisive), yielding eight outcomes from cohesion-enhancing to division-amplifying. Analyzing 7875 reader comments beneath 207 Hebrew-language articles covering Beitar Jerusalem, emblematic of Jewish nationalism, and Bnei Sakhnin, a flagship Arab-Palestinian club, findings show WJ systematically generates higher engagement and more negative sentiment. PJ elicits varied responses: supportive pre-war or when individually focused, but frequently hostile and oppositionally decoded during wartime. The study underscores PJ’s contextual contingency on timing and symbolic targeting, advocating balanced framing to foster inclusive discourse without claiming direct causation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849261454807
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an efficacy model of Peace Journalism: Engaged audience responses to Sport media in Israeli divided society from 2023 to 2024

Chen Kertcher
Journalism
Media Studies and Communication
article

Towards an efficacy model of Peace Journalism: Engaged audience responses to Sport media in Israeli divided society from 2023 to 2024

Chen Kertcher
article en

Abstract

This study proposes and applies an analytical framework of peace journalism (PJ) versus war journalism (WJ) in Israeli sport media during the 2023–2024 judicial reforms crisis and Israel-Hamas war. The framework operationalizes discursive impact through audience engagement (comment volume) and dominant sentiment (positive/cohesive, neutral/negotiated, negative/divisive), yielding eight outcomes from cohesion-enhancing to division-amplifying. Analyzing 7875 reader comments beneath 207 Hebrew-language articles covering Beitar Jerusalem, emblematic of Jewish nationalism, and Bnei Sakhnin, a flagship Arab-Palestinian club, findings show WJ systematically generates higher engagement and more negative sentiment. PJ elicits varied responses: supportive pre-war or when individually focused, but frequently hostile and oppositionally decoded during wartime. The study underscores PJ’s contextual contingency on timing and symbolic targeting, advocating balanced framing to foster inclusive discourse without claiming direct causation.

Journalism
Ariel University (IL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.