Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening With Fetal Fraction Amplification at 6–9 Weeks of Gestation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening with fetal fraction amplification between 6 and 9 weeks of gestation. METHODS: Pregnant individuals underwent two blood draws: the first between 6 0/7 and 9 6/7 weeks of gestation and the second at 10 0/7 weeks or later. Samples were processed using a cfDNA screen with fetal fraction amplification. Before the implementation of fetal fraction amplification, 4.8% of samples drawn at 10 0/7 weeks of gestation had low fetal fraction, defined as less than 4%. Logistic regression was used to determine the earliest gestational age after the implementation of fetal fraction amplification at which the proportion of samples with low fetal fraction was 4.8% or less. Positive and negative percent agreements were calculated for samples collected before and after 10 0/7 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Among 562 patients enrolled, 470 completed two blood draws and were included in the analysis. Median maternal age was 32 years (IQR 29-34 years), and median body mass index (BMI) was 25.7 (IQR 22.7-30.9). Median fetal fraction was 9.0% (IQR 6.5-13.6) for samples drawn at 6 0/7-9 6/7 weeks of gestation and 18.5% (IQR 14.4-23.9%) for those drawn at 10 0/7 weeks or later. Among patients with BMI 30 or higher (n=125), the median fetal fraction was 7.2% (IQR 5.5-10.7%) for samples drawn at 6 0/7-9 6/7 weeks of gestation and 14.7% (IQR 11.3-18.5) for those drawn at 10 0/7 weeks or later. The gestational age at which 4.8% of samples had low fetal fraction was 7 3/7 weeks. The screen failure rate was 1.5% (7/470) for samples drawn at 6 0/7-9 6/7 weeks of gestation and 0.3% (1/291) for samples drawn at 7 3/7-9 6/7 weeks. Because patients often present for routine prenatal care beginning in the 8th week of gestation, we also calculated performance at 8 0/7-9 6/7 weeks. During this period, the screen failure rate was 0.4% (1/241), and both positive and negative percent agreements were 100% for all screened aneuploidies. At 10 0/7 weeks of gestation or later, two samples were called positive for trisomy 21 and one for trisomy 7; their corresponding samples at 8 0/7-9 6/7 weeks were also called positive. Fetal sex call concordance was 100% for both XX (110/110) and XY (130/130). CONCLUSION: Fetal fraction amplification enables cfDNA screening beginning at 7 3/7 weeks of gestation. Performance and concordance data are limited but suggest the clinical feasibility of offering cfDNA screening with fetal fraction amplification beginning at 8 weeks of gestation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006324
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening With Fetal Fraction Amplification at 6–9 Weeks of Gestation

Jhett Bordwell, Summer Pierson, Dale Muzzey, Katherine Johansen Taber et al.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening With Fetal Fraction Amplification at 6–9 Weeks of Gestation

Jhett Bordwell, Summer Pierson, Dale Muzzey, Katherine Johansen Taber, Lorraine Dugoff, Brent Mabey
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening with fetal fraction amplification between 6 and 9 weeks of gestation. METHODS: Pregnant individuals underwent two blood draws: the first between 6 0/7 and 9 6/7 weeks of gestation and the second at 10 0/7 weeks or later. Samples were processed using a cfDNA screen with fetal fraction amplification. Before the implementation of fetal fraction amplification, 4.8% of samples drawn at 10 0/7 weeks of gestation had low fetal fraction, defined as less than 4%. Logistic regression was used to determine the earliest gestational age after the implementation of fetal fraction amplification at which the proportion of samples with low fetal fraction was 4.8% or less. Positive and negative percent agreements were calculated for samples collected before and after 10 0/7 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Among 562 patients enrolled, 470 completed two blood draws and were included in the analysis. Median maternal age was 32 years (IQR 29-34 years), and median body mass index (BMI) was 25.7 (IQR 22.7-30.9). Median fetal fraction was 9.0% (IQR 6.5-13.6) for samples drawn at 6 0/7-9 6/7 weeks of gestation and 18.5% (IQR 14.4-23.9%) for those drawn at 10 0/7 weeks or later. Among patients with BMI 30 or higher (n=125), the median fetal fraction was 7.2% (IQR 5.5-10.7%) for samples drawn at 6 0/7-9 6/7 weeks of gestation and 14.7% (IQR 11.3-18.5) for those drawn at 10 0/7 weeks or later. The gestational age at which 4.8% of samples had low fetal fraction was 7 3/7 weeks. The screen failure rate was 1.5% (7/470) for samples drawn at 6 0/7-9 6/7 weeks of gestation and 0.3% (1/291) for samples drawn at 7 3/7-9 6/7 weeks. Because patients often present for routine prenatal care beginning in the 8th week of gestation, we also calculated performance at 8 0/7-9 6/7 weeks. During this period, the screen failure rate was 0.4% (1/241), and both positive and negative percent agreements were 100% for all screened aneuploidies. At 10 0/7 weeks of gestation or later, two samples were called positive for trisomy 21 and one for trisomy 7; their corresponding samples at 8 0/7-9 6/7 weeks were also called positive. Fetal sex call concordance was 100% for both XX (110/110) and XY (130/130). CONCLUSION: Fetal fraction amplification enables cfDNA screening beginning at 7 3/7 weeks of gestation. Performance and concordance data are limited but suggest the clinical feasibility of offering cfDNA screening with fetal fraction amplification beginning at 8 weeks of gestation.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
Myriad Genetics (US)
Myriad Genetics
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.