Multi-hazard exposure disproportionately affects vulnerable populations globally

The growing global exposure to multi-hazard events highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of how vulnerability interacts with hazards. This is particularly critical in regions with lower socio-economic development, where vulnerability amplifies hazard impacts and hinders recovery efforts, perpetuating cycles of poverty and inequality. Here, we provide a global analysis of multi-hazard exposure and disparities in socio-economic vulnerabilities using data on hazard co-occurrence and population distribution for the period 2004–2017 (with sensitivity checks extending selected hazards to 2000–2025). We analyse individual vulnerability indicators as well as their intersections. Our findings reveal that most of the global population has been exposed to multi-hazards (84%) and the findings further disclose a clear global trend: populations in areas with lower socio-economic development are significantly more likely to experience frequent multi-hazards. In the context of climate change and rising inequality, addressing these disparities is essential for advancing global development and climate justice. Frequent multi hazard exposure aligns with persistent inequalities across regions and indicators, according to a global spatial analysis integrating hazard event records with population and socioeconomic data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03652-3
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-hazard exposure disproportionately affects vulnerable populations globally

Nicole van Maanen, Judith Claassen, Amelie Paszkowski, Stefan Schneiderbauer et al.
Communications Earth & Environment
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Multi-hazard exposure disproportionately affects vulnerable populations globally

Nicole van Maanen, Judith Claassen, Amelie Paszkowski, Stefan Schneiderbauer, Saki Yotsui, Timothy Tiggeloven, Tristian Stolte, Chia-Wei Chang
article en

Abstract

The growing global exposure to multi-hazard events highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of how vulnerability interacts with hazards. This is particularly critical in regions with lower socio-economic development, where vulnerability amplifies hazard impacts and hinders recovery efforts, perpetuating cycles of poverty and inequality. Here, we provide a global analysis of multi-hazard exposure and disparities in socio-economic vulnerabilities using data on hazard co-occurrence and population distribution for the period 2004–2017 (with sensitivity checks extending selected hazards to 2000–2025). We analyse individual vulnerability indicators as well as their intersections. Our findings reveal that most of the global population has been exposed to multi-hazards (84%) and the findings further disclose a clear global trend: populations in areas with lower socio-economic development are significantly more likely to experience frequent multi-hazards. In the context of climate change and rising inequality, addressing these disparities is essential for advancing global development and climate justice. Frequent multi hazard exposure aligns with persistent inequalities across regions and indicators, according to a global spatial analysis integrating hazard event records with population and socioeconomic data.

Communications Earth & Environment
National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction (TW), Eurac Research (IT), Tohoku University (JP), University of the Free State (ZA), University of Oxford (GB), Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine (IT), CMCC Foundation - Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (IT), United Nations University (DE), Institute for Environment and Human Security (DE), The University of Tokyo (JP), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.