A Comprehensive Flash Flood Risk Assessment Framework for Mountainous Regions: A Case Study in Chongqing, China

Quantitative risk assessment of flash floods is crucial for developing disaster prevention and mitigation strategies. This study developed a refined framework that innovatively integrates field-validated data from Chongqing’s flash flood disaster investigation project with AHP, factor analysis, and cluster analysis to quantify hazard, vulnerability, resistance, and risk indicators at a 30 m grid. Unlike existing coarse-scale assessments that rely on generic indicators, this hybrid model, calibrated by observed disaster evidence, significantly enhanced the local relevance and reliability of risk zoning. The validity of this framework was confirmed through validation against objective weighting methods and historical flash flood locations. The results indicated that the risk value of flash floods in Chongqing was between 0.24 and 0.69, with extremely high-risk and high-risk zones covering 42,388 km2 (51.47%) of the study area. This accurately identifies areas at high risk of flash floods and provides a basis for government decision-making regarding priority areas for disaster risk reduction investments. Verification showed that 83.44% of historical disaster points fall within medium-risk or above zones, confirming the framework’s accuracy in identifying flood-prone hotspots and providing actionable support for targeted early warning and resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17050526
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Flash Flood Risk Assessment Framework for Mountainous Regions: A Case Study in Chongqing, China

Lingyun Zhao, Wenlong Niu, L T Wang, Jing Qin et al.
Atmosphere
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

A Comprehensive Flash Flood Risk Assessment Framework for Mountainous Regions: A Case Study in Chongqing, China

Lingyun Zhao, Wenlong Niu, L T Wang, Jing Qin, Yaning Yi, Ruihu Yao, Jie Niu, Mingming Zhu
article en

Abstract

Quantitative risk assessment of flash floods is crucial for developing disaster prevention and mitigation strategies. This study developed a refined framework that innovatively integrates field-validated data from Chongqing’s flash flood disaster investigation project with AHP, factor analysis, and cluster analysis to quantify hazard, vulnerability, resistance, and risk indicators at a 30 m grid. Unlike existing coarse-scale assessments that rely on generic indicators, this hybrid model, calibrated by observed disaster evidence, significantly enhanced the local relevance and reliability of risk zoning. The validity of this framework was confirmed through validation against objective weighting methods and historical flash flood locations. The results indicated that the risk value of flash floods in Chongqing was between 0.24 and 0.69, with extremely high-risk and high-risk zones covering 42,388 km2 (51.47%) of the study area. This accurately identifies areas at high risk of flash floods and provides a basis for government decision-making regarding priority areas for disaster risk reduction investments. Verification showed that 83.44% of historical disaster points fall within medium-risk or above zones, confirming the framework’s accuracy in identifying flood-prone hotspots and providing actionable support for targeted early warning and resource allocation.

AtmosphereVol. 17(5)
China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), Jiangsu Provincial Water Survey & Design Institute (China) (CN), Coal Industry Jinan Design & Research Institute (China) (CN)
China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.