Legal Legibility: Gender and Sexual Classifications in the Law

A growing body of literature examines either how state and legal institutions directly classify and categorize people along the lines of sex, gender, and sexuality or how such institutions set the parameters by which other social institutions must do so. Synthesizing this scholarship, this article conceptualizes these related social practices as constellations of biopolitical sorting, or processes that regulate both individual bodies and broader populations in line with state classification efforts. This review focuses on three key areas that have been central to this line of research: identity, citizenship and immigration, and institutional access and placement. It reveals how processes of biopolitical sorting aimed at sex, gender, and sexuality cut across social domains to shape the life chances of regulated individuals, as well as to contour what the very categories of sex, gender, and sexuality mean across contexts. The article concludes with broad analytical takeaways from this body of research and a discussion of directions for future research, including a focus on artificial intelligence, state formation and maintenance, and the constitutive relationship of law and identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-042224-095223
Primary Topic
Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Legibility: Gender and Sexual Classifications in the Law

Stefan Vogler, Matthew Heinrichs
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
article

Legal Legibility: Gender and Sexual Classifications in the Law

Stefan Vogler, Matthew Heinrichs
article en

Abstract

A growing body of literature examines either how state and legal institutions directly classify and categorize people along the lines of sex, gender, and sexuality or how such institutions set the parameters by which other social institutions must do so. Synthesizing this scholarship, this article conceptualizes these related social practices as constellations of biopolitical sorting, or processes that regulate both individual bodies and broader populations in line with state classification efforts. This review focuses on three key areas that have been central to this line of research: identity, citizenship and immigration, and institutional access and placement. It reveals how processes of biopolitical sorting aimed at sex, gender, and sexuality cut across social domains to shape the life chances of regulated individuals, as well as to contour what the very categories of sex, gender, and sexuality mean across contexts. The article concludes with broad analytical takeaways from this body of research and a discussion of directions for future research, including a focus on artificial intelligence, state formation and maintenance, and the constitutive relationship of law and identity.

Annual Review of Law and Social Science
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Illinois System (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.