Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Women with term pregnancies undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) usually present with hemodynamic variability and a high incidence of hypotension. Among the commonly used anesthetic drugs for CSEA, ropivacaine reduces the incidence of hypotension compared with bupivacaine. However, most studies have focused on blood pressure and heart rate measurements to evaluate the effects of these two anesthetic drugs on parturients. This study aimed to compare maternal cardiac output and hemodynamic parameters, such as cardiac preload and afterload, of ropivacaine and bupivacaine using transthoracic echocardiography. METHODS: Eighty-two parturients scheduled for elective caesarean deliveries under CSEA anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive 0.5% bupivacaine 7.5-8.5 mg (n = 41) or 0.5% ropivacaine 11-12.5 mg (n = 41) with different medication doses used for different height-ranges. Cardiac output, stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, end-diastolic volume, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were measured using transthoracic echocardiography before anesthesia; at 1, 5, and 10 min after CSEA; at delivery; and 1-2 min after the oxytocin administration. The primary outcome was the change in cardiac output (CO) at 5 min. Secondary outcomes included maternal hemodynamic, anesthetic efficacy, maternal side effects and fetal outcome data. RESULTS: Normalized cardiac output was higher in the ropivacaine group at 5 min after CSEA (92.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 87.1-98.3%) than in the bupivacaine group (79.8%; 95% CI: 74.2-85.3%) (P = 0.001). CO, SV, end-diastolic volume, and blood pressure were greater, systemic vascular resistance and phenylephrine dosage were lower, and the incidence of bradycardia was lower in the ropivacaine group. The 1-minute Apgar score was higher in the ropivacaine group (P = 0.043). Other neonatal outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to bupivacaine, ropivacaine demonstrated higher cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), blood pressure, and an improved 1-minute neonatal Apgar score in elective cesarean deliveries under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR220006454. Date of registration: October 11, 2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09284-x
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Fanshu Ni, Haiyin Ji, Ping Zhao
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal–epidural anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Fanshu Ni, Haiyin Ji, Ping Zhao
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with term pregnancies undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) usually present with hemodynamic variability and a high incidence of hypotension. Among the commonly used anesthetic drugs for CSEA, ropivacaine reduces the incidence of hypotension compared with bupivacaine. However, most studies have focused on blood pressure and heart rate measurements to evaluate the effects of these two anesthetic drugs on parturients. This study aimed to compare maternal cardiac output and hemodynamic parameters, such as cardiac preload and afterload, of ropivacaine and bupivacaine using transthoracic echocardiography. METHODS: Eighty-two parturients scheduled for elective caesarean deliveries under CSEA anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive 0.5% bupivacaine 7.5-8.5 mg (n = 41) or 0.5% ropivacaine 11-12.5 mg (n = 41) with different medication doses used for different height-ranges. Cardiac output, stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, end-diastolic volume, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were measured using transthoracic echocardiography before anesthesia; at 1, 5, and 10 min after CSEA; at delivery; and 1-2 min after the oxytocin administration. The primary outcome was the change in cardiac output (CO) at 5 min. Secondary outcomes included maternal hemodynamic, anesthetic efficacy, maternal side effects and fetal outcome data. RESULTS: Normalized cardiac output was higher in the ropivacaine group at 5 min after CSEA (92.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 87.1-98.3%) than in the bupivacaine group (79.8%; 95% CI: 74.2-85.3%) (P = 0.001). CO, SV, end-diastolic volume, and blood pressure were greater, systemic vascular resistance and phenylephrine dosage were lower, and the incidence of bradycardia was lower in the ropivacaine group. The 1-minute Apgar score was higher in the ropivacaine group (P = 0.043). Other neonatal outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to bupivacaine, ropivacaine demonstrated higher cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), blood pressure, and an improved 1-minute neonatal Apgar score in elective cesarean deliveries under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR220006454. Date of registration: October 11, 2022.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University (CN), China Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.