From feasibility to neuroanatomic validity of remote cognitive smartphone assessments in early Alzheimer’s disease

ABSTRACT Digital health technologies (DHT) offer a promising solution to the timely identification of early Alzheimer’s disease (eAD) to enable early treatment. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, adherence, reliability, and preliminary clinical and content validity of the novel AD Digital Assessment Suite (AD-DAS). 123 individuals (32 healthy controls (HC), 31 amyloid-PET negative (SCDn), 30 amyloid-PET positive (SCDp) with subjective cognitive decline, and 30 early AD (eAD)) participated. AD-DAS was remotely deployed for 28 days. Remote testing was feasible (97.6% completers), acceptable (>85% “good”), and associated with high adherence (96%). Metrics showed moderate to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.53–0.91), associations with clinical comparators (adjusted R 2 0.01-0.24), differentiated eAD from other known groups (absolute log odds differences 0.6–3.28), and correlated with brain atrophy in expected regions. Episodic and working memory AD-DAS metrics differentiated SCDp from SCDn participants. These preliminary findings suggest that AD-DAS may be a promising tool for detecting cognitive impairments in early AD stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03108-0
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From feasibility to neuroanatomic validity of remote cognitive smartphone assessments in early Alzheimer’s disease

Thanneer M. Perumal, Kirsten I. Taylor, Simone Rey‐Riek, Arnaud M Wolfer et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

From feasibility to neuroanatomic validity of remote cognitive smartphone assessments in early Alzheimer’s disease

Thanneer M. Perumal, Kirsten I. Taylor, Simone Rey‐Riek, Arnaud M Wolfer, Niels Hagenbuch, Eduardo A. Aponte, Macarena García Valdecasas Colell, Štefan Holiga, David Watson, Emma Poon, Foteini Orfaniotou, Beijue Shi, Goullou Keita, Mercè Boada, Raphael Ullmann, Christopher H. Chatham, Irma T. Kurniawan, Miguel Veloso, Wael Abouelkheir
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Digital health technologies (DHT) offer a promising solution to the timely identification of early Alzheimer’s disease (eAD) to enable early treatment. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, adherence, reliability, and preliminary clinical and content validity of the novel AD Digital Assessment Suite (AD-DAS). 123 individuals (32 healthy controls (HC), 31 amyloid-PET negative (SCDn), 30 amyloid-PET positive (SCDp) with subjective cognitive decline, and 30 early AD (eAD)) participated. AD-DAS was remotely deployed for 28 days. Remote testing was feasible (97.6% completers), acceptable (>85% “good”), and associated with high adherence (96%). Metrics showed moderate to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.53–0.91), associations with clinical comparators (adjusted R 2 0.01-0.24), differentiated eAD from other known groups (absolute log odds differences 0.6–3.28), and correlated with brain atrophy in expected regions. Episodic and working memory AD-DAS metrics differentiated SCDp from SCDn participants. These preliminary findings suggest that AD-DAS may be a promising tool for detecting cognitive impairments in early AD stages.

npj Digital Medicine
University of Geneva (CH), Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), Clinical Research Services (DE), Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (US)
F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.