The ideological role of accounting in hegemonic projects: unpacking the drama of NGO corruption scandals

Purpose This study aims to understand the production and consumption of discourse and to uncover ideology and hegemony in corruption scandals involving non-governmental organization (NGO) actors in Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach A case study method was used to investigate the corruption scandal at an NGO (ABC). The authors used 509 articles from five national media outlets. They used Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (FCDA), impression management and counter-accounting to uncover the ideological role of accounting in the discourse contestation and the struggle for hegemony between ABC and counter-accounting actors. Findings ABC actors used defensive and assertive impression-management discourses, coupled with social and humanitarian ideologies, to conceal their corrupt behavior. Counter-accounting actors used embezzlement discourses and social media movements, such as “#Don’tBelieveABC” (#JanganPercayaABC) and “#QuickActionEmbezzlement” (#AksiCepatTilep), to expose the corrupt behavior of ABC actors, drawing on emancipatory ideologies. Both contestants used accounting to serve their ideological interests and maintain their hegemony. Counter-accounting actors won the contest for hegemony by using a chain of discourses, including accounting, law and politics. The discourse of impression management has failed to sustain the actor of ABC’s hegemony. Research limitations/implications Our single case study cannot be generalized to a broader population, and the media news data may be biased. Practical implications The media and the public should be encouraged to play a role in uncovering and guarding against corruption within organizations. For NGOs, further improving good governance, transparency and accountability is essential for complying with regulations, preventing corrupt behavior and avoiding litigation. For regulators, they should establish stricter rules on good governance, transparency and financial accountability for NGOs. For accounting academics, they should enhance the role of accounting as a social and moral practice through emancipatory accounting research. Originality/value This paper presents a new theoretical framework for FDCA that integrates impression management and counter-accounting to understand the ideological role of accounting for hegemonic struggle and to expose corruption scandals within NGOs. This paper also provides new knowledge about the roles of media and counter-accounting in the emancipatory accounting movement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-11-2025-0644
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ideological role of accounting in hegemonic projects: unpacking the drama of NGO corruption scandals

Ika Putri Larasati, Sri Pujiningsih, Sharifah Norzehan Syed Yusuf, Ani Wilujeng Suryani
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

The ideological role of accounting in hegemonic projects: unpacking the drama of NGO corruption scandals

Ika Putri Larasati, Sri Pujiningsih, Sharifah Norzehan Syed Yusuf, Ani Wilujeng Suryani
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to understand the production and consumption of discourse and to uncover ideology and hegemony in corruption scandals involving non-governmental organization (NGO) actors in Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach A case study method was used to investigate the corruption scandal at an NGO (ABC). The authors used 509 articles from five national media outlets. They used Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (FCDA), impression management and counter-accounting to uncover the ideological role of accounting in the discourse contestation and the struggle for hegemony between ABC and counter-accounting actors. Findings ABC actors used defensive and assertive impression-management discourses, coupled with social and humanitarian ideologies, to conceal their corrupt behavior. Counter-accounting actors used embezzlement discourses and social media movements, such as “#Don’tBelieveABC” (#JanganPercayaABC) and “#QuickActionEmbezzlement” (#AksiCepatTilep), to expose the corrupt behavior of ABC actors, drawing on emancipatory ideologies. Both contestants used accounting to serve their ideological interests and maintain their hegemony. Counter-accounting actors won the contest for hegemony by using a chain of discourses, including accounting, law and politics. The discourse of impression management has failed to sustain the actor of ABC’s hegemony. Research limitations/implications Our single case study cannot be generalized to a broader population, and the media news data may be biased. Practical implications The media and the public should be encouraged to play a role in uncovering and guarding against corruption within organizations. For NGOs, further improving good governance, transparency and accountability is essential for complying with regulations, preventing corrupt behavior and avoiding litigation. For regulators, they should establish stricter rules on good governance, transparency and financial accountability for NGOs. For accounting academics, they should enhance the role of accounting as a social and moral practice through emancipatory accounting research. Originality/value This paper presents a new theoretical framework for FDCA that integrates impression management and counter-accounting to understand the ideological role of accounting for hegemonic struggle and to expose corruption scandals within NGOs. This paper also provides new knowledge about the roles of media and counter-accounting in the emancipatory accounting movement.

International Journal of Ethics and Systems
State University of Malang (ID), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Universitas Negeri Malang
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.