Simplified Switching to Once‐Weekly Insulin Icodec Without an Initial One‐Time Additional Dose Versus Once‐Daily Insulin Glargine <scp>U100</scp> in Basal Insulin‐Treated Type 2 Diabetes ( <scp>ONWARDS</scp> 10): A Randomised Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT Aims ONWARDS 10 assessed switching from daily basal insulins to once‐weekly insulin icodec without a one‐time additional dose at first injection. Materials and Methods In this treat‐to‐target, open‐label, 26‐week, phase 3b trial, adults with basal‐insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) with glycated haemoglobin [HbA 1c ] 7.0%–10.0% were randomised to once‐weekly icodec without an initial one‐time additional dose or to once‐daily insulin glargine U100. Primary endpoint was change in HbA 1c from baseline to week 26 (non‐inferiority margin: 0.3%‐points); secondary endpoints included change in time in range (TIR; 70–180 mg/dL [3.9–10.0 mmol/L]) from baseline (weeks −4 to 0) to weeks 22–26, and number of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episodes (weeks 0–31). Results Overall, 412 participants were randomised to icodec ( n = 206) or glargine U100 ( n = 206). At week 26, estimated mean HbA 1c was 7.2% with icodec (baseline 8.1%) and 7.5% with glargine U100 (baseline 8.0%). Estimated treatment difference (ETD) for change in HbA 1c was −0.2%‐points (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.4, −0.1), confirming non‐inferiority of icodec versus glargine U100 ( p &lt; 0.0001). Self‐measured blood glucose did not increase following icodec initiation. Change in TIR from baseline to weeks 22–26 was statistically significantly higher with icodec than with glargine U100 (estimated mean change: 18.0%‐points vs. 12.1%‐points; ETD: 5.9%‐points [95% CI: 2.6, 9.2], p = 0.0005). Combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia rate was numerically lower with icodec than with glargine U100 (0.45 vs. 0.59 episodes per patient‐year of exposure). Conclusions Omitting the one‐time additional dose simplifies switching to icodec in adults with basal‐insulin‐treated T2D without compromising initial glycaemic control. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06340854

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70813
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simplified Switching to Once‐Weekly Insulin Icodec Without an Initial One‐Time Additional Dose Versus Once‐Daily Insulin Glargine U100 in Basal Insulin‐Treated Type 2 Diabetes ( ONWARDS 10): A Randomised Controlled Trial

Joshua Feinberg, Cathrine Scavenius, A Cheng, Julio Rosenstock et al.
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Simplified Switching to Once‐Weekly Insulin Icodec Without an Initial One‐Time Additional Dose Versus Once‐Daily Insulin Glargine U100 in Basal Insulin‐Treated Type 2 Diabetes ( ONWARDS 10): A Randomised Controlled Trial

Joshua Feinberg, Cathrine Scavenius, A Cheng, Julio Rosenstock, Priyanka Rao, Chantal Mathieu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims ONWARDS 10 assessed switching from daily basal insulins to once‐weekly insulin icodec without a one‐time additional dose at first injection. Materials and Methods In this treat‐to‐target, open‐label, 26‐week, phase 3b trial, adults with basal‐insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) with glycated haemoglobin [HbA 1c ] 7.0%–10.0% were randomised to once‐weekly icodec without an initial one‐time additional dose or to once‐daily insulin glargine U100. Primary endpoint was change in HbA 1c from baseline to week 26 (non‐inferiority margin: 0.3%‐points); secondary endpoints included change in time in range (TIR; 70–180 mg/dL [3.9–10.0 mmol/L]) from baseline (weeks −4 to 0) to weeks 22–26, and number of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episodes (weeks 0–31). Results Overall, 412 participants were randomised to icodec ( n = 206) or glargine U100 ( n = 206). At week 26, estimated mean HbA 1c was 7.2% with icodec (baseline 8.1%) and 7.5% with glargine U100 (baseline 8.0%). Estimated treatment difference (ETD) for change in HbA 1c was −0.2%‐points (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.4, −0.1), confirming non‐inferiority of icodec versus glargine U100 ( p &lt; 0.0001). Self‐measured blood glucose did not increase following icodec initiation. Change in TIR from baseline to weeks 22–26 was statistically significantly higher with icodec than with glargine U100 (estimated mean change: 18.0%‐points vs. 12.1%‐points; ETD: 5.9%‐points [95% CI: 2.6, 9.2], p = 0.0005). Combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia rate was numerically lower with icodec than with glargine U100 (0.45 vs. 0.59 episodes per patient‐year of exposure). Conclusions Omitting the one‐time additional dose simplifies switching to icodec in adults with basal‐insulin‐treated T2D without compromising initial glycaemic control. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06340854

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), Trillium Health Centre (CA), Novo Nordisk (India) (IN), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.