Digital assets, personal property and categorisation: the Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025

Abstract Personal property has had an enduring bipartite categorisation of things in action and things in possession. But digital assets, supposedly situated outside both categories, have disrupted this categorisation. Recent statutory reform, through the Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025, seeks to permit a third category of personal property. This contribution outlines the effect of the Act and of a third category of personal property. The third category is negatively defined, dependent on the boundaries of the other categories for its scope. The breadth of the thing in action category is not settled, which means that the scope of the third category is undefined. The Act suggests that digital assets can be a ‘thing’ that is ‘the object of personal property rights’. But the Act does not define what this thing is, nor does it tell us what rights an owner of a third category thing might have. Cases that have considered these questions have highlighted the transactional abilities these assets enable. If this is the focus, then these assets are best viewed as things in action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legal Studies
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2026.10116
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital assets, personal property and categorisation: the Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025

Katie Mccay
Legal Studies
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

Digital assets, personal property and categorisation: the Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025

Katie Mccay
article en

Abstract

Abstract Personal property has had an enduring bipartite categorisation of things in action and things in possession. But digital assets, supposedly situated outside both categories, have disrupted this categorisation. Recent statutory reform, through the Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025, seeks to permit a third category of personal property. This contribution outlines the effect of the Act and of a third category of personal property. The third category is negatively defined, dependent on the boundaries of the other categories for its scope. The breadth of the thing in action category is not settled, which means that the scope of the third category is undefined. The Act suggests that digital assets can be a ‘thing’ that is ‘the object of personal property rights’. But the Act does not define what this thing is, nor does it tell us what rights an owner of a third category thing might have. Cases that have considered these questions have highlighted the transactional abilities these assets enable. If this is the focus, then these assets are best viewed as things in action.

Legal Studies
University of Bristol (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.