Applying a complex systems-informed approach to population health interventions: a methodological case-study example of traffic restriction schemes outside schools

BACKGROUND: Population health interventions may change physical, social or fiscal environments to shift health behaviours and often operate within a complex system of interacting factors. Systems methods are frequently suggested as a way to provide an overview of the interactions that determine behaviours or actions and may help to understand how or why interventions might (or might not) change health. However, there are few examples of how these methods have been used to guide empirical evaluations of public health interventions. METHODS: We describe our application of a qualitative complex systems approach within an ongoing evaluation of a population health intervention: traffic restriction schemes, often referred to as School Streets, where motor vehicle access outside schools is restricted at pick-up and drop-off times. This paper presents a methodological case study illustrating how these methods can be applied in practice. We intended to use systems methods across our evaluation; here we describe how we use these methods to build theory. Following the five-step approach outlined by Alvarado et al., (2023), we produced research propositions, systems archetypes and a causal loop diagram to understand the underlying system in which traffic restriction schemes are implemented and their potential impact on school-based active travel. RESULTS: In bringing together diverse and multi-disciplinary evidence from different stakeholders we identified unanticipated systems interactions such as increased initial tensions and conflicts between users of different active travel modes (e.g. cyclists vs pedestrians). Using causal loop diagrams and systems archetypes, we developed research propositions focused on funding and implementation, safety, habit formation and the potential for unintended consequences. CONCLUSIONS: Taking a complex systems approach has deepened our understanding of how traffic restriction schemes interact with their broader context and helped us develop a guiding theoretical framework for our ongoing evaluation. We intend this work to stimulate discussion, offer insights for future evaluations of population-level health interventions, and encourage public health researchers to adopt systems methods in their own evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27532-9
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying a complex systems-informed approach to population health interventions: a methodological case-study example of traffic restriction schemes outside schools

Cornelia Guell, Olivia Alliott, Kate Garrott, Emma Carey et al.
BMC Public Health
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Applying a complex systems-informed approach to population health interventions: a methodological case-study example of traffic restriction schemes outside schools

Cornelia Guell, Olivia Alliott, Kate Garrott, Emma Carey, the project team, Richard Patterson, Lucy Anderson, David Ogilvie, Jenna Panter
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population health interventions may change physical, social or fiscal environments to shift health behaviours and often operate within a complex system of interacting factors. Systems methods are frequently suggested as a way to provide an overview of the interactions that determine behaviours or actions and may help to understand how or why interventions might (or might not) change health. However, there are few examples of how these methods have been used to guide empirical evaluations of public health interventions. METHODS: We describe our application of a qualitative complex systems approach within an ongoing evaluation of a population health intervention: traffic restriction schemes, often referred to as School Streets, where motor vehicle access outside schools is restricted at pick-up and drop-off times. This paper presents a methodological case study illustrating how these methods can be applied in practice. We intended to use systems methods across our evaluation; here we describe how we use these methods to build theory. Following the five-step approach outlined by Alvarado et al., (2023), we produced research propositions, systems archetypes and a causal loop diagram to understand the underlying system in which traffic restriction schemes are implemented and their potential impact on school-based active travel. RESULTS: In bringing together diverse and multi-disciplinary evidence from different stakeholders we identified unanticipated systems interactions such as increased initial tensions and conflicts between users of different active travel modes (e.g. cyclists vs pedestrians). Using causal loop diagrams and systems archetypes, we developed research propositions focused on funding and implementation, safety, habit formation and the potential for unintended consequences. CONCLUSIONS: Taking a complex systems approach has deepened our understanding of how traffic restriction schemes interact with their broader context and helped us develop a guiding theoretical framework for our ongoing evaluation. We intend this work to stimulate discussion, offer insights for future evaluations of population-level health interventions, and encourage public health researchers to adopt systems methods in their own evaluations.

BMC Public Health
University of Exeter (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Cambridge School (PT), MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.