Too hard, too confronting: the reluctance of schools to publicly acknowledge harm

Abstract Despite having the largest caregiving responsibilities for children outside of families, schools are settings in which egregious forms of harm to children have occurred. As further allegations of non-recent and contemporary abuse of children in schools come to light, principals must decide whether to publicly acknowledge this harm and grapple with the complexities of how to do so. We examine what the research literature, recent public inquiries, and child safety policy reveal about the acknowledgement of harm in Victorian school settings, and identify a critical omission regarding how principals might manage such a response. We argue that public harm acknowledgement strengthens existing child protection cultures and practices and should be viewed by schools, child safety regulators, and governments as a way to foster a shared commitment to prevent past failures from recurring. To assist principals who choose to initiate public harm acknowledgement responses in the future, we call for urgent policy advice and guidance to help them navigate this challenging area of leadership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Educational Researcher
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-026-00968-z
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Too hard, too confronting: the reluctance of schools to publicly acknowledge harm

Katie Wright, Kate O'Connor, John Crowley
The Australian Educational Researcher
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Too hard, too confronting: the reluctance of schools to publicly acknowledge harm

Katie Wright, Kate O'Connor, John Crowley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite having the largest caregiving responsibilities for children outside of families, schools are settings in which egregious forms of harm to children have occurred. As further allegations of non-recent and contemporary abuse of children in schools come to light, principals must decide whether to publicly acknowledge this harm and grapple with the complexities of how to do so. We examine what the research literature, recent public inquiries, and child safety policy reveal about the acknowledgement of harm in Victorian school settings, and identify a critical omission regarding how principals might manage such a response. We argue that public harm acknowledgement strengthens existing child protection cultures and practices and should be viewed by schools, child safety regulators, and governments as a way to foster a shared commitment to prevent past failures from recurring. To assist principals who choose to initiate public harm acknowledgement responses in the future, we call for urgent policy advice and guidance to help them navigate this challenging area of leadership.

The Australian Educational ResearcherVol. 53(3)
La Trobe University (AU)
La Trobe University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.