Classification of Speech Sound Disorders in French-speaking Children

INTRODUCTION: No study has validated English-based classification systems of speech-sound disorders (SSD) with French-speaking children. This study aimed to determine whether SSDs in French-speaking children could be classified into three groups: motor speech, phonological (or speech delay), and articulation (or speech errors), and whether the phonological group could be further divided into phonological delay, consistent phonological disorder, and inconsistent phonological disorder, as proposed in current classification systems. METHOD: Participants included 59 children with SSD and 40 children with typical development (TD), aged 4 to 8 years. They were administered a battery of tests that targeted phonological and motor speech aspects of production. Focusing primarily on three motor speech tasks (intra-word variability, diadochokinetic (DDK) rate, and an oral motor examination), we examined whether children exhibited difficulty across all three tasks (consistent with a motor speech disorder), displayed difficulty on the intra-word variability test (inconsistent phonological disorder), or did not exhibit difficulty with any of these three tasks (phonology group). In the case of children classified in the phonology group, we examined their transcription data to determine whether their errors were usual (phonological delay), unusual (phonological disorder) or restricted to difficulty with /s/ and /r/ (articulation). RESULTS: Categorization using strict criteria was unsuccessful leading to alternative approaches to categorization. Focusing primarily on two tests, DDK and intra-word variability, we found support for a motor speech group (n=15), an inconsistent phonological group (n=18), and a phonological delay group (n=26). One child was classified as having an articulation disorder and no child was classified as having a consistent phonological disorder. CONCLUSION: Findings with French-speaking children provide mixed support for current SSD classification systems. Results were consistent with alternative categorizations of SSD that posit three groupings (motor speech, inconsistent phonological, phonological) or with studies that document a continuum of severity on the phonological - motor speech continuum.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000552486
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of Speech Sound Disorders in French-speaking Children

M. Kehoe
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Language Development and Disorders
article

Classification of Speech Sound Disorders in French-speaking Children

M. Kehoe
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: No study has validated English-based classification systems of speech-sound disorders (SSD) with French-speaking children. This study aimed to determine whether SSDs in French-speaking children could be classified into three groups: motor speech, phonological (or speech delay), and articulation (or speech errors), and whether the phonological group could be further divided into phonological delay, consistent phonological disorder, and inconsistent phonological disorder, as proposed in current classification systems. METHOD: Participants included 59 children with SSD and 40 children with typical development (TD), aged 4 to 8 years. They were administered a battery of tests that targeted phonological and motor speech aspects of production. Focusing primarily on three motor speech tasks (intra-word variability, diadochokinetic (DDK) rate, and an oral motor examination), we examined whether children exhibited difficulty across all three tasks (consistent with a motor speech disorder), displayed difficulty on the intra-word variability test (inconsistent phonological disorder), or did not exhibit difficulty with any of these three tasks (phonology group). In the case of children classified in the phonology group, we examined their transcription data to determine whether their errors were usual (phonological delay), unusual (phonological disorder) or restricted to difficulty with /s/ and /r/ (articulation). RESULTS: Categorization using strict criteria was unsuccessful leading to alternative approaches to categorization. Focusing primarily on two tests, DDK and intra-word variability, we found support for a motor speech group (n=15), an inconsistent phonological group (n=18), and a phonological delay group (n=26). One child was classified as having an articulation disorder and no child was classified as having a consistent phonological disorder. CONCLUSION: Findings with French-speaking children provide mixed support for current SSD classification systems. Results were consistent with alternative categorizations of SSD that posit three groupings (motor speech, inconsistent phonological, phonological) or with studies that document a continuum of severity on the phonological - motor speech continuum.

Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.