Health Outcome Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Adult Women in Spain

Background/Objectives: Health outcome determinants affecting Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among the adult female population are scarce in Spain. This study aimed to describe the health outcomes and determinants of HPV vaccination in women 18–65 years attending lower genital tract outpatient clinics across regions of Spain. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, non-interventional, descriptive, and comparative nationwide study. Sociodemographic characteristics and health outcomes included obstetric, gynecological and HPV vaccination antecedents, together with patient-reported outcomes related to HPV infection. Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Among 2004 adult women recruited, 1907 (95.2%) were eligible for analysis. Vaccine uptake was 48.8%; 81.6% among women who were ever HPV positive (adjusted OR = 2.16 [95% CI: 1.59–2.93], p < 0.001), but 65.9% among women with an active infection, which acted as a negative factor for vaccination (OR = 0.63 [0.45–0.87], p = 0.005), as did increasing age (OR = 0.92 [0.90–0.93], p < 0.001); the higher the age, the lower the adjusted likelihood of being vaccinated. HPV knowledge and adequate physician-provided information were weakly associated with vaccination likelihood. A history of conization (OR = 7.48 [5.34–10.47], p < 0.001), use of contraception (OR = 1.49 [1.13–1.96], p = 0.004), infection with high-risk or unknown-risk HPV genotypes (OR = 1.86 [1.23–2.82], p = 0.003 and OR = 1.68 [1.17–2.42], p = 0.006, respectively), and Spanish nationality (OR = 2.46 [1.68–3.61], p < 0.001) were identified as factors associated with a higher vaccination likelihood. Conclusions: This study found that HPV vaccination uptake is improvable. Previous HPV infection favored vaccination; however, active infection and increasing age acted against vaccination. HPV knowledge and adequate healthcare professional information appeared to favor vaccination, along with, most notably, a history of cervical surgery (conization), contraceptive use, or infection with high-risk or unknown-risk HPV genotypes. Spanish women had a higher likelihood of receiving HPV vaccination than foreign residents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14050460
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health Outcome Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Adult Women in Spain

Marta del Pino, R. Oliva-Sánchez, Carmen González‐Granados, Jesús de la Fuente-Valero et al.
Vaccines
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Health Outcome Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Adult Women in Spain

Marta del Pino, R. Oliva-Sánchez, Carmen González‐Granados, Jesús de la Fuente-Valero, Mar Ramírez‐Mena, María Fasero, Aaron Cohen-Castiel, Javier Rejas-Gutiérrez, Pluvio J. Coronado, SPAIN-GOG on behalf of the HPV-Know Collaborative Group, Javier Calvo-Torres, Beatriz Procas-Ramón
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Health outcome determinants affecting Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among the adult female population are scarce in Spain. This study aimed to describe the health outcomes and determinants of HPV vaccination in women 18–65 years attending lower genital tract outpatient clinics across regions of Spain. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, non-interventional, descriptive, and comparative nationwide study. Sociodemographic characteristics and health outcomes included obstetric, gynecological and HPV vaccination antecedents, together with patient-reported outcomes related to HPV infection. Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Among 2004 adult women recruited, 1907 (95.2%) were eligible for analysis. Vaccine uptake was 48.8%; 81.6% among women who were ever HPV positive (adjusted OR = 2.16 [95% CI: 1.59–2.93], p < 0.001), but 65.9% among women with an active infection, which acted as a negative factor for vaccination (OR = 0.63 [0.45–0.87], p = 0.005), as did increasing age (OR = 0.92 [0.90–0.93], p < 0.001); the higher the age, the lower the adjusted likelihood of being vaccinated. HPV knowledge and adequate physician-provided information were weakly associated with vaccination likelihood. A history of conization (OR = 7.48 [5.34–10.47], p < 0.001), use of contraception (OR = 1.49 [1.13–1.96], p = 0.004), infection with high-risk or unknown-risk HPV genotypes (OR = 1.86 [1.23–2.82], p = 0.003 and OR = 1.68 [1.17–2.42], p = 0.006, respectively), and Spanish nationality (OR = 2.46 [1.68–3.61], p < 0.001) were identified as factors associated with a higher vaccination likelihood. Conclusions: This study found that HPV vaccination uptake is improvable. Previous HPV infection favored vaccination; however, active infection and increasing age acted against vaccination. HPV knowledge and adequate healthcare professional information appeared to favor vaccination, along with, most notably, a history of cervical surgery (conization), contraceptive use, or infection with high-risk or unknown-risk HPV genotypes. Spanish women had a higher likelihood of receiving HPV vaccination than foreign residents.

VaccinesVol. 14(5)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (ES), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Hospital Universitario Dexeus (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Hospital General de Tomelloso (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (ES), Hospital General San Jorge (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (ES), Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.