What is behind the term ‘model’ organisms?

Abstract Model organisms play a central role in biological research, yet the conceptual questions they raise continue to provoke debate among philosophers. This article examines one such question: What are the distinctive features that qualify model organisms as scientific models? Building on and extending previous work, we propose a refined conceptual framework for understanding model organisms in the context of contemporary scientific practice. Our framework highlights six key features that, collectively, uniquely characterize model organisms. We argue that model organisms should not be viewed merely as components within experimental systems but rather as autonomous experimental systems in their own right.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2026.10218
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is behind the term ‘model’ organisms?

Héloïse Athéa
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

What is behind the term ‘model’ organisms?

Héloïse Athéa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Model organisms play a central role in biological research, yet the conceptual questions they raise continue to provoke debate among philosophers. This article examines one such question: What are the distinctive features that qualify model organisms as scientific models? Building on and extending previous work, we propose a refined conceptual framework for understanding model organisms in the context of contemporary scientific practice. Our framework highlights six key features that, collectively, uniquely characterize model organisms. We argue that model organisms should not be viewed merely as components within experimental systems but rather as autonomous experimental systems in their own right.

Philosophy of Science
Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (FR)
University of Cambridge, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.