European Expert Consensus on Essential Variables for Teledermatological Assessment of Skin Tumours

Teledermatology is increasingly used for the assessment of suspicious skin tumours, yet referral content remains poorly standardiszed. To develop a European expert consensus on the essential clinical and visual variables required for teledermatological assessment of primary skin tumours. A three3-round modified Delphi study was conducted among experienced dermatologists. In round 1, participants proposed essential variables. In round 2, variables were rated for essentiality, clinical relevance, and feasibility. In round 3, binary voting was used to define final consensus. Consensus was predefined as ≥67 %% agreement. Interquatile ranges were calculated to assess response stability. A total of 47 variables were proposed in round 1. Following quantitative scoring, 34 variables progressed to round 3. Twelve variables met the predefined consensus threshold, primarily related to image quality and lesion characteristics. Sensitivity analyses using geographic subgroups and higher consensus thresholds demonstrated that image-quality variables were the most robust. This European expert consensus defines a focused and clinically practical core dataset for teledermatological assessment of skin tumours. These variables may support standardiszation of referrals and facilitate future validation and AI-assisted workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Dermato Venereologica
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v106.adv-2026-0512
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

European Expert Consensus on Essential Variables for Teledermatological Assessment of Skin Tumours

Niels Kvorning Ternov, Åsa Ingvar, Tine Vestergaard, Kasper Bostlund Assersen et al.
Acta Dermato Venereologica
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

European Expert Consensus on Essential Variables for Teledermatological Assessment of Skin Tumours

Niels Kvorning Ternov, Åsa Ingvar, Tine Vestergaard, Kasper Bostlund Assersen, Kari Nielsen, Alexander Detlefsen, Lars Konge
article en

Abstract

Teledermatology is increasingly used for the assessment of suspicious skin tumours, yet referral content remains poorly standardiszed. To develop a European expert consensus on the essential clinical and visual variables required for teledermatological assessment of primary skin tumours. A three3-round modified Delphi study was conducted among experienced dermatologists. In round 1, participants proposed essential variables. In round 2, variables were rated for essentiality, clinical relevance, and feasibility. In round 3, binary voting was used to define final consensus. Consensus was predefined as ≥67 %% agreement. Interquatile ranges were calculated to assess response stability. A total of 47 variables were proposed in round 1. Following quantitative scoring, 34 variables progressed to round 3. Twelve variables met the predefined consensus threshold, primarily related to image quality and lesion characteristics. Sensitivity analyses using geographic subgroups and higher consensus thresholds demonstrated that image-quality variables were the most robust. This European expert consensus defines a focused and clinically practical core dataset for teledermatological assessment of skin tumours. These variables may support standardiszation of referrals and facilitate future validation and AI-assisted workflows.

Acta Dermato VenereologicaVol. 106
Lund University (SE), Odense University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (DK), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.