Feasibility of home-based, remotely delivered exercise training to improve physical function in older sepsis survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Sepsis survivors frequently experience post-discharge physical function decline and encounter logistical barriers to participation in traditional outpatient rehabilitation. This pilot study examined the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of a remotely delivered, home-based exercise program on physical function in older sepsis survivors. In this single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT), sepsis survivors aged ≥ 55 years were randomized to (a) 12 weeks of avatar-guided, progressive exercise training group (EX) or (b) a standard care control group (CO). Primary outcomes were feasibility (retention, adherence) and safety (adverse events), whereas secondary outcomes were changes in the 30-s Sit-to-Stand (30SSTS), 4-Stage Balance Test (4SBT), Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) tests, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Zubrod's (ECOG/Zubrod) performance status score. Twenty-one participants were randomized to either EX (n = 10, mean age = 69.6 ± 8.5 years, 40% females) or CO (n = 11, mean age = 72.3 ± 7.9 years, 45% females). Mean retention was 95% and adherence to exercise training was 76%. Thirty-four adverse events (AEs) occurred (EX = 11; CO = 16; consented but not randomized = 7 events), including four serious AEs that were unrelated to the study. The EX group showed trends toward improvements in lower-extremity strength (30SSTS: 1.14 ± 2.91 repetitions, Cohen's d = 0.393) and balance (4SBT: 5.07 ± 4.75 s, d = 1.07), whereas the CO group showed no change in balance on the 4SBT (0.01 ± 4.38 s, d = 0.003) and trends toward decline in lower-extremity strength on the 30SSTS (- 0.88 ± 0.99 repetitions, d = - 0.883). TUG performance showed modest trends toward reductions in completion time in both groups (EX: - 1.42 ± 6.58 s, d = - 0.216; CO: - 1.27 ± 2.73 s, d = - 0.466). ECOG/Zubrod scores showed a modest trend toward improvement in the EX group subset. This pilot RCT demonstrated that a 12-week, remotely delivered exercise program was safe and feasible for older sepsis survivors and showed preliminary signals of positive change in lower-extremity strength, balance, and functional status, which warrants testing efficacy in an adequately powered Phase IIb RCT. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05568511.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GeroScience
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-026-02328-2
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility of home-based, remotely delivered exercise training to improve physical function in older sepsis survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Rola S Zeidan, Robert T. Mankowski, Juan Sarmiento Delgado, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh et al.
GeroScience
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Feasibility of home-based, remotely delivered exercise training to improve physical function in older sepsis survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Rola S Zeidan, Robert T. Mankowski, Juan Sarmiento Delgado, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh, Faheem W. Guirgis, Rezvan Ghaderpanah, Margaret K. Ohama, Naveen Baskaran, Philip A. Efron, Thomas W. Buford, Min-Han Jung, Yi Lin, Fang-Chi Hsu, Sheryl Flynn, Barbara K. Smith, Stephen D. Anton
article en

Abstract

Sepsis survivors frequently experience post-discharge physical function decline and encounter logistical barriers to participation in traditional outpatient rehabilitation. This pilot study examined the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of a remotely delivered, home-based exercise program on physical function in older sepsis survivors. In this single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT), sepsis survivors aged ≥ 55 years were randomized to (a) 12 weeks of avatar-guided, progressive exercise training group (EX) or (b) a standard care control group (CO). Primary outcomes were feasibility (retention, adherence) and safety (adverse events), whereas secondary outcomes were changes in the 30-s Sit-to-Stand (30SSTS), 4-Stage Balance Test (4SBT), Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) tests, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Zubrod's (ECOG/Zubrod) performance status score. Twenty-one participants were randomized to either EX (n = 10, mean age = 69.6 ± 8.5 years, 40% females) or CO (n = 11, mean age = 72.3 ± 7.9 years, 45% females). Mean retention was 95% and adherence to exercise training was 76%. Thirty-four adverse events (AEs) occurred (EX = 11; CO = 16; consented but not randomized = 7 events), including four serious AEs that were unrelated to the study. The EX group showed trends toward improvements in lower-extremity strength (30SSTS: 1.14 ± 2.91 repetitions, Cohen's d = 0.393) and balance (4SBT: 5.07 ± 4.75 s, d = 1.07), whereas the CO group showed no change in balance on the 4SBT (0.01 ± 4.38 s, d = 0.003) and trends toward decline in lower-extremity strength on the 30SSTS (- 0.88 ± 0.99 repetitions, d = - 0.883). TUG performance showed modest trends toward reductions in completion time in both groups (EX: - 1.42 ± 6.58 s, d = - 0.216; CO: - 1.27 ± 2.73 s, d = - 0.466). ECOG/Zubrod scores showed a modest trend toward improvement in the EX group subset. This pilot RCT demonstrated that a 12-week, remotely delivered exercise program was safe and feasible for older sepsis survivors and showed preliminary signals of positive change in lower-extremity strength, balance, and functional status, which warrants testing efficacy in an adequately powered Phase IIb RCT. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05568511.

GeroScience
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University of Florida (US), Blue Marble Health (United States) (US), Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (US), Birmingham VA Medical Center (US), Wake Forest University (US), Florida College (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.