A Comparative Study of Environmental Justice in the East and West: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Norms, Political Economy, and Governance

Against the backdrop of an accelerating global environmental crisis, the concept of "environmental justice" has evolved from a grassroots activist slogan into a central theme in international politics and public policy. However, a significant chasm persists between Eastern and Western societies in the conceptualization, attribution of responsibility, and policy implementation of environmental justice. This divergence is increasingly magnified in climate diplomacy, supply chain governance, and the politics of standards-setting. This article adopts a comparative perspective, integrating three analytical lenses—normative ethics, political economy, and governance institutions—to critically examine the tensions and potential compatibilities between the prevailing Western narrative of "historical responsibility and capability" and the East Asian, particularly Chinese, emphasis on the "right to development, stage-based differentiation, and state capacity." The analysis reveals that contemporary debates on environmental justice are not merely moral contests but are deeply enmeshed in the politics of emissions accounting (production vs. consumption), the systemic transfer of environmental costs through the global division of labor, the politicization of technology and standards, and the differential impacts of policy instruments such as ESG, carbon border mechanisms, and renewable energy transitions. The article concludes that transcending the East-West binary to forge a viable global environmental governance mechanism requires simultaneously addressing the legitimacy of responsibility allocation, the equitable distribution of transition costs, and the procedural rights of communities affected by these policies. Only by operationalizing the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities" into tangible institutional arrangements can a sustainable and just global environmental future be achieved.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20323129
Primary Topic
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Environmental Justice in the East and West: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Norms, Political Economy, and Governance

Jheng-Yu Yin1*, Wen-Chuan Ke2, Ho Yin Gary YEE3
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
article

A Comparative Study of Environmental Justice in the East and West: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Norms, Political Economy, and Governance

Jheng-Yu Yin1*, Wen-Chuan Ke2, Ho Yin Gary YEE3
article en

Abstract

Against the backdrop of an accelerating global environmental crisis, the concept of "environmental justice" has evolved from a grassroots activist slogan into a central theme in international politics and public policy. However, a significant chasm persists between Eastern and Western societies in the conceptualization, attribution of responsibility, and policy implementation of environmental justice. This divergence is increasingly magnified in climate diplomacy, supply chain governance, and the politics of standards-setting. This article adopts a comparative perspective, integrating three analytical lenses—normative ethics, political economy, and governance institutions—to critically examine the tensions and potential compatibilities between the prevailing Western narrative of "historical responsibility and capability" and the East Asian, particularly Chinese, emphasis on the "right to development, stage-based differentiation, and state capacity." The analysis reveals that contemporary debates on environmental justice are not merely moral contests but are deeply enmeshed in the politics of emissions accounting (production vs. consumption), the systemic transfer of environmental costs through the global division of labor, the politicization of technology and standards, and the differential impacts of policy instruments such as ESG, carbon border mechanisms, and renewable energy transitions. The article concludes that transcending the East-West binary to forge a viable global environmental governance mechanism requires simultaneously addressing the legitimacy of responsibility allocation, the equitable distribution of transition costs, and the procedural rights of communities affected by these policies. Only by operationalizing the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities" into tangible institutional arrangements can a sustainable and just global environmental future be achieved.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.