Sensitivities of a simulated Arctic stratocumulus to aerosol and microphysical parameters

Abstract. Low-level, mixed-phase clouds are a key component of the Arctic energy budget and can impact the extent and thickness of sea ice. These clouds are influenced by aerosols and microphysical processes that can determine the phase partitioning and thereby cloud lifetime and radiative impacts. Atmospheric models often struggle to represent phase partitioning in Arctic mixed-phase clouds correctly. Aerosol number concentration (ANC), aerosol type (Atype), ice crystal number concentration (ICNC), and ice crystal morphology (ice crystal habit; IChab) have previously been shown to impact phase partitioning in Arctic clouds. In this study, we quantified the relative importance of these parameters for simulated liquid water path (LWP), ice water path (IWP), and downward longwave radiation at the surface (DWLW) of a slightly supercooled Arctic mixed-phase cloud by applying factorial analysis. Using MIMICA, the MISU-MIT Cloud Aerosol large-eddy simulation code, we found that ANC was the most important parameter for LWP and DWLW, while ICNC controlled IWP. IChab ranked third for all simulated variables, yet it crucially determined the final phase state of the cloud. The impact of Atype was negligible compared to the other three parameters. Recognizing the limits of relying on a single case study and model, our results suggest that future Arctic field campaigns should prioritize observations of ANC, ICNC, and, crucially, ice habit for slightly supercooled mixed-phase clouds. Models must also represent different ice habits to accurately simulate cloud phase partitioning and its subsequent impact on the Arctic energy budget.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15495-2026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivities of a simulated Arctic stratocumulus to aerosol and microphysical parameters

Jessie M. Creamean, Roman Pohorsky, Nicolas Fauré, Luisa Ickes et al.
1 citations
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
2.38
article

Sensitivities of a simulated Arctic stratocumulus to aerosol and microphysical parameters

Jessie M. Creamean, Roman Pohorsky, Nicolas Fauré, Luisa Ickes, Michael Tjernström, Sonja Murto, Julia Schmale, Hannah Frostenberg, Erik S. Thomson, Heather Guy, Ian M. Brooks, Paul Zieger, Lea Haberstock, Camille Mavis, Julia Kojoj
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Low-level, mixed-phase clouds are a key component of the Arctic energy budget and can impact the extent and thickness of sea ice. These clouds are influenced by aerosols and microphysical processes that can determine the phase partitioning and thereby cloud lifetime and radiative impacts. Atmospheric models often struggle to represent phase partitioning in Arctic mixed-phase clouds correctly. Aerosol number concentration (ANC), aerosol type (Atype), ice crystal number concentration (ICNC), and ice crystal morphology (ice crystal habit; IChab) have previously been shown to impact phase partitioning in Arctic clouds. In this study, we quantified the relative importance of these parameters for simulated liquid water path (LWP), ice water path (IWP), and downward longwave radiation at the surface (DWLW) of a slightly supercooled Arctic mixed-phase cloud by applying factorial analysis. Using MIMICA, the MISU-MIT Cloud Aerosol large-eddy simulation code, we found that ANC was the most important parameter for LWP and DWLW, while ICNC controlled IWP. IChab ranked third for all simulated variables, yet it crucially determined the final phase state of the cloud. The impact of Atype was negligible compared to the other three parameters. Recognizing the limits of relying on a single case study and model, our results suggest that future Arctic field campaigns should prioritize observations of ANC, ICNC, and, crucially, ice habit for slightly supercooled mixed-phase clouds. Models must also represent different ice habits to accurately simulate cloud phase partitioning and its subsequent impact on the Arctic energy budget.

Atmospheric chemistry and physicsVol. 26(21)
Uppsala University (SE), University of Leeds (GB), Stockholm University (SE), National Centre for Atmospheric Science (GB), Bolin Centre for Climate Research (SE), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Chalmers University of Technology (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE), Colorado State University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
2.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon