Development of a question prompt list to support Consent for Genomic Testing (CoGenT) and research

While genomic testing is increasingly utilised to personalise cancer treatment, its complexity creates challenges in achieving informed consent. Partnering with patients, carers, researchers and health professionals, we developed a Question Prompt List (QPL) aiming to support communication and informed consent for tumour profiling and genomic research in oncology. Participants (n = 38) included cancer patients participating (or not) in genomic research, carers, researchers and clinicians. Two rounds of interviews elicited information needs and suggested questions, followed by feedback on the draft QPL and its potential value. We produced concise answers for all questions, edited wording using health literacy principles, and refined according to feedback. The QPL includes 29 items arranged into three sections: Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP), Results of CGP, and About the Genomic Research Study. Participants believed the QPL would empower patients and carers, support clinicians and researchers to engage with patient/family queries, and enable better informed consent in genomic oncology. The Consent in Genomic Testing (CoGenT) Question Prompt List, including evidence-based answers, has been developed rigorously and collaboratively. This simple and flexible tool is perceived as acceptable and useful for patients, carers, clinicians, and research personnel engaging in informed consent for genomic research including tumour profiling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Genetics
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-026-02839-0
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a question prompt list to support Consent for Genomic Testing (CoGenT) and research

Ilona Juraskova, Nicci Bartley, Mandy L. Ballinger, Caitlin Delaney et al.
Human Genetics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Development of a question prompt list to support Consent for Genomic Testing (CoGenT) and research

Ilona Juraskova, Nicci Bartley, Mandy L. Ballinger, Caitlin Delaney, Anastasia Latin, Christine Cockburn, Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell, Phyllis Butow, Katherine M. Tucker, Lauren O’Hara, Kirsten McCaffery, Jolyn Hersch
article en

Abstract

While genomic testing is increasingly utilised to personalise cancer treatment, its complexity creates challenges in achieving informed consent. Partnering with patients, carers, researchers and health professionals, we developed a Question Prompt List (QPL) aiming to support communication and informed consent for tumour profiling and genomic research in oncology. Participants (n = 38) included cancer patients participating (or not) in genomic research, carers, researchers and clinicians. Two rounds of interviews elicited information needs and suggested questions, followed by feedback on the draft QPL and its potential value. We produced concise answers for all questions, edited wording using health literacy principles, and refined according to feedback. The QPL includes 29 items arranged into three sections: Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP), Results of CGP, and About the Genomic Research Study. Participants believed the QPL would empower patients and carers, support clinicians and researchers to engage with patient/family queries, and enable better informed consent in genomic oncology. The Consent in Genomic Testing (CoGenT) Question Prompt List, including evidence-based answers, has been developed rigorously and collaboratively. This simple and flexible tool is perceived as acceptable and useful for patients, carers, clinicians, and research personnel engaging in informed consent for genomic research including tumour profiling.

Human GeneticsVol. 145(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Prince of Wales Hospital (AU), Rare Cancers Australia (AU)
Cancer Australia, University of Sydney
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.