Comparative effectiveness of the Clutch Cutter versus Dual knife for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection by non-expert endoscopists: a single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: A Clutch Cutter is a grasping scissor forceps device used for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This device can grasp and incise the target tissue similar to the action of a biopsy forceps. Therefore, ESD with a Clutch Cutter may be easier and safer than that performed with non-scissor-type knives. This study verified the usefulness of the Clutch Cutter by nonexpert endoscopists during ESD for superficial esophageal cancer. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled 125 patients who underwent ESD as a first-line therapy for superficial esophageal cancer between January 2016 and June 2023 at Saiseikai Suita Hospital. The patients were divided into groups based on the ESD device: a Clutch Cutter or a non-scissor-type device (dual knife). The clinical characteristics and technical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among one hundred twenty-five patients, seventy-nine patients underwent nonexpert endoscopic treatment, of which twenty-one patients underwent ESD with a Clutch Cutter and fifty-eight patients with a dual knife. There is a significant difference in sex distribution between the two groups, with a higher percentage of males in the dual knife group (94.8%) compared to the Clutch Cutter group (71.4%) (p = 0.01). Patients in the Clutch Cutter group had shorter procedure times (60 min) than those in the dual knife group (93 min) (p = 0.002). However, en bloc and R0 resection rates were not significantly different between the groups. In the multivariate analysis, procedure time (min) was significantly correlated with device type (coefficient 58.86, 95% confidence interval: 26.99-90.72) and tumor size (coefficient 4.9, 95% confidence interval: 3.58-6.21). CONCLUSION: ESD for superficial esophageal cancer with the Clutch Cutter significantly shortened procedure time compared to that with the dual knife for nonexpert endoscopists. Therefore, the Clutch Cutter may be a preferred-device for nonexpert endoscopists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04936-w
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effectiveness of the Clutch Cutter versus Dual knife for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection by non-expert endoscopists: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Chiemi Mizuno, Yasuhide Mitsumoto, Takayuki Katayama, Maho Fujinami et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Comparative effectiveness of the Clutch Cutter versus Dual knife for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection by non-expert endoscopists: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Chiemi Mizuno, Yasuhide Mitsumoto, Takayuki Katayama, Maho Fujinami, Takeshi Okanoue, Toshihide Shima, Shinsaku Fujiishi, Takahiro Nonaka, Hirohisa Oya, Kei Terasaki, Takahiro Miura, Shohei Amioka, Kyoko Sakai, Keiichiro Okuda, Kohei Fukumoto, Yoshimichi Yorioka, Hidetomi Kimura, Kazuhisa Watanabe
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A Clutch Cutter is a grasping scissor forceps device used for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This device can grasp and incise the target tissue similar to the action of a biopsy forceps. Therefore, ESD with a Clutch Cutter may be easier and safer than that performed with non-scissor-type knives. This study verified the usefulness of the Clutch Cutter by nonexpert endoscopists during ESD for superficial esophageal cancer. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled 125 patients who underwent ESD as a first-line therapy for superficial esophageal cancer between January 2016 and June 2023 at Saiseikai Suita Hospital. The patients were divided into groups based on the ESD device: a Clutch Cutter or a non-scissor-type device (dual knife). The clinical characteristics and technical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among one hundred twenty-five patients, seventy-nine patients underwent nonexpert endoscopic treatment, of which twenty-one patients underwent ESD with a Clutch Cutter and fifty-eight patients with a dual knife. There is a significant difference in sex distribution between the two groups, with a higher percentage of males in the dual knife group (94.8%) compared to the Clutch Cutter group (71.4%) (p = 0.01). Patients in the Clutch Cutter group had shorter procedure times (60 min) than those in the dual knife group (93 min) (p = 0.002). However, en bloc and R0 resection rates were not significantly different between the groups. In the multivariate analysis, procedure time (min) was significantly correlated with device type (coefficient 58.86, 95% confidence interval: 26.99-90.72) and tumor size (coefficient 4.9, 95% confidence interval: 3.58-6.21). CONCLUSION: ESD for superficial esophageal cancer with the Clutch Cutter significantly shortened procedure time compared to that with the dual knife for nonexpert endoscopists. Therefore, the Clutch Cutter may be a preferred-device for nonexpert endoscopists.

BMC Gastroenterology
Saiseikai Suita Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.