Other‐Oriented Lie‐Telling and Moral Evaluations During Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study

ABSTRACT This study examined the longitudinal associations of adolescents’ lie‐telling and moral evaluations of other‐oriented lies told to friends, as well as the potential moderating roles of age and peer influence. Adolescents ( N = 818; 11–17 years at T1; M age = 13.30, 49.80% male) reported how often they told other‐oriented lies to their friends, their moral evaluations of other‐oriented lies, and their sensitivity to peer influence annually for 3 years. In early adolescence, a bidirectional relationship between moral evaluations and lie‐telling was found. Additionally, sensitivity to peer influence was bidirectionally associated with both moral evaluations and lie‐telling. In late adolescence, moral evaluations predicted lie‐telling frequency, but lie frequency did not predict evaluations. Both moral evaluations and lie‐telling predicted sensitivity to peer influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Development
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.70069
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Other‐Oriented Lie‐Telling and Moral Evaluations During Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study

Teena Willoughby, Victoria W. Dykstra, Angela D. Evans, Tabeer Afzal
Social Development
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Other‐Oriented Lie‐Telling and Moral Evaluations During Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study

Teena Willoughby, Victoria W. Dykstra, Angela D. Evans, Tabeer Afzal
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examined the longitudinal associations of adolescents’ lie‐telling and moral evaluations of other‐oriented lies told to friends, as well as the potential moderating roles of age and peer influence. Adolescents ( N = 818; 11–17 years at T1; M age = 13.30, 49.80% male) reported how often they told other‐oriented lies to their friends, their moral evaluations of other‐oriented lies, and their sensitivity to peer influence annually for 3 years. In early adolescence, a bidirectional relationship between moral evaluations and lie‐telling was found. Additionally, sensitivity to peer influence was bidirectionally associated with both moral evaluations and lie‐telling. In late adolescence, moral evaluations predicted lie‐telling frequency, but lie frequency did not predict evaluations. Both moral evaluations and lie‐telling predicted sensitivity to peer influence.

Social DevelopmentVol. 35(3)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Brock University (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.