Real-World Evidence from a Nationwide Prospective Study of the Efficacy/Safety of Systemic Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: First 1,000 Patients of the PRISM Study

Background: The PRISM study is a nationwide, multicenter, prospective observational study in Japan evaluating the real-world efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC patients starting systemic therapy are prospectively enrolled, enabling assessment of outcomes and tolerability across treatment lines. By capturing all patients treated in routine practice, the study is expected to provide a clear picture of the actual treatment outcomes in Japan. Methods: We analyzed the first 1,000 patients enrolled between July 2020 and July 2022, focusing on outcomes of first-line therapy and subsequent patterns. Data on demographics, tumor stage, liver function, regimens, survival, and adverse events (AEs) were prospectively collected and centrally monitored. Survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier, and tumor responses were assessed per RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST. Results: Of 935 evaluable patients, 82.8% received atezolizumab + bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) and 15.2% lenvatinib as first-line therapy. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 21.8 and 7.7 months for Atezo+Bev, and 20.8 and 6.7 months for lenvatinib, with overall survival numerically longer than that reported in pivotal clinical trials, while progression-free survival remained comparable. Objective response rates were 29.6% (RECIST) and 35.0% (mRECIST) for Atezo+Bev, 24.6% and 35.2% for lenvatinib, and 0% and 6.3% for sorafenib by RECIST and mRECIST, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 21.6% and 22.9%, with safety profiles consistent with prior reports. Appropriately 50% of patients received second-line therapy, most often lenvatinib after Atezo+Bev and vice versa, with a median progression-free survival of ~4 months; later-line regimens yielded even shorter benefit. Conclusions: The PRISM study confirms the real-world reproducibility of Atezo+Bev and lenvatinib in Japan, demonstrating their feasibility across diverse patient populations. Ongoing follow-up and subgroup analyses, particularly in special populations, are expected to help optimize long-term outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Cancer
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000552686
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Evidence from a Nationwide Prospective Study of the Efficacy/Safety of Systemic Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: First 1,000 Patients of the PRISM Study

Sadahisa Ogasawara, Tomoharu Yamada, Masafumi Ikeda, Masatoshi Kudo et al.
Liver Cancer
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Real-World Evidence from a Nationwide Prospective Study of the Efficacy/Safety of Systemic Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: First 1,000 Patients of the PRISM Study

Sadahisa Ogasawara, Tomoharu Yamada, Masafumi Ikeda, Masatoshi Kudo, Shinji Itoh, Kazushi Numata, Takuji Okusaka, Ryosuke Tateishi, Junji Furuse, Tomokazu Kawaoka, Takashi Niizeki, Taro Yamashita, Daisuke Onozuka, Tatsuya Yamashita, Yasuhito Tanaka
article en

Abstract

Background: The PRISM study is a nationwide, multicenter, prospective observational study in Japan evaluating the real-world efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC patients starting systemic therapy are prospectively enrolled, enabling assessment of outcomes and tolerability across treatment lines. By capturing all patients treated in routine practice, the study is expected to provide a clear picture of the actual treatment outcomes in Japan. Methods: We analyzed the first 1,000 patients enrolled between July 2020 and July 2022, focusing on outcomes of first-line therapy and subsequent patterns. Data on demographics, tumor stage, liver function, regimens, survival, and adverse events (AEs) were prospectively collected and centrally monitored. Survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier, and tumor responses were assessed per RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST. Results: Of 935 evaluable patients, 82.8% received atezolizumab + bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) and 15.2% lenvatinib as first-line therapy. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 21.8 and 7.7 months for Atezo+Bev, and 20.8 and 6.7 months for lenvatinib, with overall survival numerically longer than that reported in pivotal clinical trials, while progression-free survival remained comparable. Objective response rates were 29.6% (RECIST) and 35.0% (mRECIST) for Atezo+Bev, 24.6% and 35.2% for lenvatinib, and 0% and 6.3% for sorafenib by RECIST and mRECIST, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 21.6% and 22.9%, with safety profiles consistent with prior reports. Appropriately 50% of patients received second-line therapy, most often lenvatinib after Atezo+Bev and vice versa, with a median progression-free survival of ~4 months; later-line regimens yielded even shorter benefit. Conclusions: The PRISM study confirms the real-world reproducibility of Atezo+Bev and lenvatinib in Japan, demonstrating their feasibility across diverse patient populations. Ongoing follow-up and subgroup analyses, particularly in special populations, are expected to help optimize long-term outcomes.

Liver Cancer
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.