A robust strain-based Cosserat rod finite element formulation for modeling soft robots

Abstract Soft robots are increasingly expected to operate in unstructured environments where compliance, environmental coupling, and embedded sensing fundamentally shape their behavior. However, the Cosserat rod models commonly used in soft robotics originate from two largely independent traditions: robotics-driven formulations optimized for control or intuitive simplicity, and mechanics-driven formulations optimized for structural generality. Considered separately, neither tradition fulfills the requirements for sensing, fabrication, environmental interaction, and numerical reliability of modern soft robotic systems. Drawing on our modeling and design experience with soft robotic systems, we identified a set of design challenges that guided the development of a suitable Cosserat rod formulation. To address these challenges, we propose a Cosserat rod model expressed directly in strain coordinates, matching the quantities measured by embedded sensors and eliminating the need for global pose tracking. A finite-element discretization supports localized tactile forces and environmental interactions, while a globally singularity-free quaternion representation enables full floating-base capability. We demonstrate that a Petrov–Galerkin projection, in contrast to the existing Bubnov–Galerkin formulation in soft robotics, decouples the choice of velocity coordinates and virtual displacements from the configuration parametrization. This enables the dynamics to be expressed in terms of sensor-aligned velocity variables, such as nodal absolute velocities from reliable existing sensors, rather than parametrization-dependent strain rates. This alignment simplifies estimator and controller design and also yields a constant mass matrix as a computational benefit. In addition, the formulation provides a unified mechanism for embedding hardware-intended strain constraints directly through intrinsic Lagrange-multiplier enforcement, ensuring that the model evolves strictly within the robot’s physically realizable strain manifold. The resulting finite-element formulation is total Lagrangian, objective, locking-free, globally singularity-free, and path-independent. Robust convergence and a significant reduction in nonlinear solver iterations (98.4% and 99.8% relative to the second most efficient comparison formulation) are demonstrated on well-known benchmark examples. By integrating and extending strengths from both robotics-oriented and mechanics-oriented approaches, this framework offers a practical, robust, sensor-aligned, and computationally efficient Cosserat rod model suited for soft robots operating beyond controlled laboratory environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Multibody System Dynamics
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-026-10170-9
Primary Topic
Soft Robotics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A robust strain-based Cosserat rod finite element formulation for modeling soft robots

Philipp Mitterbach, Irene A. Kuling, Simon R. Eugster, Alexander Y. Pogromsky
Multibody System Dynamics
Soft Robotics and Applications
article

A robust strain-based Cosserat rod finite element formulation for modeling soft robots

Philipp Mitterbach, Irene A. Kuling, Simon R. Eugster, Alexander Y. Pogromsky
article en

Abstract

Abstract Soft robots are increasingly expected to operate in unstructured environments where compliance, environmental coupling, and embedded sensing fundamentally shape their behavior. However, the Cosserat rod models commonly used in soft robotics originate from two largely independent traditions: robotics-driven formulations optimized for control or intuitive simplicity, and mechanics-driven formulations optimized for structural generality. Considered separately, neither tradition fulfills the requirements for sensing, fabrication, environmental interaction, and numerical reliability of modern soft robotic systems. Drawing on our modeling and design experience with soft robotic systems, we identified a set of design challenges that guided the development of a suitable Cosserat rod formulation. To address these challenges, we propose a Cosserat rod model expressed directly in strain coordinates, matching the quantities measured by embedded sensors and eliminating the need for global pose tracking. A finite-element discretization supports localized tactile forces and environmental interactions, while a globally singularity-free quaternion representation enables full floating-base capability. We demonstrate that a Petrov–Galerkin projection, in contrast to the existing Bubnov–Galerkin formulation in soft robotics, decouples the choice of velocity coordinates and virtual displacements from the configuration parametrization. This enables the dynamics to be expressed in terms of sensor-aligned velocity variables, such as nodal absolute velocities from reliable existing sensors, rather than parametrization-dependent strain rates. This alignment simplifies estimator and controller design and also yields a constant mass matrix as a computational benefit. In addition, the formulation provides a unified mechanism for embedding hardware-intended strain constraints directly through intrinsic Lagrange-multiplier enforcement, ensuring that the model evolves strictly within the robot’s physically realizable strain manifold. The resulting finite-element formulation is total Lagrangian, objective, locking-free, globally singularity-free, and path-independent. Robust convergence and a significant reduction in nonlinear solver iterations (98.4% and 99.8% relative to the second most efficient comparison formulation) are demonstrated on well-known benchmark examples. By integrating and extending strengths from both robotics-oriented and mechanics-oriented approaches, this framework offers a practical, robust, sensor-aligned, and computationally efficient Cosserat rod model suited for soft robots operating beyond controlled laboratory environments.

Multibody System Dynamics
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Soft Robotics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.