Grounded relevance: how exploring soil data can promote perceptions of data relevance, data literacy, learning, and motivation

ABSTRACT The ability to analyze, interpret, and draw insights from data and data visualizations is quickly becoming a necessary skill for success across multiple disciplines and careers. However, people struggle to make meaning from data, and traditional data science curricula fall short of emphasizing its relevance to underrepresented students. To create opportunities for meaningful applications of data science for racially/ethnically diverse students, we developed and implemented an online learning module focused on engaging N = 298 undergraduate students at a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) in an analysis of place-based soil data focused on identifying factors related to antibiotic-producing bacteria. Using a pretest-posttest study design, we found that students’ perceptions of data science relevance (Cohen’s d = 0.33) and microbiology knowledge ( d = 0.39) significantly improved. We also inductively coded qualitative survey responses to explore how students framed “relevance” and how their perceptions changed from pretest to posttest, revealing that students perceived data tools as offering new scientific insights and applications across multiple disciplines, although changes over time were not significant. Automated text analysis of students’ analytical thinking using LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count) revealed that students tended to use significantly less “discrepant” ( d =−0.22) and “tentative” ( d = −0.19) language over time, suggesting that they increased their level of certainty from pretest to posttest. We also found that students identified more relevant and specific environmental- and soil-specific variables for data investigations at posttest compared to pretest. Overall, our findings provide evidence that interdisciplinary and place-based approaches to microbiology and data literacy instruction support learning and motivation for racially/ethnically diverse groups of students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00332-25
Primary Topic
Statistics Education and Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grounded relevance: how exploring soil data can promote perceptions of data relevance, data literacy, learning, and motivation

Ian Thacker, Sara Shields-Menard, Sandrina Ramirez, Rebecca Schroeder et al.
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Statistics Education and Methodologies
article

Grounded relevance: how exploring soil data can promote perceptions of data relevance, data literacy, learning, and motivation

Ian Thacker, Sara Shields-Menard, Sandrina Ramirez, Rebecca Schroeder, Corina Lopez
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ability to analyze, interpret, and draw insights from data and data visualizations is quickly becoming a necessary skill for success across multiple disciplines and careers. However, people struggle to make meaning from data, and traditional data science curricula fall short of emphasizing its relevance to underrepresented students. To create opportunities for meaningful applications of data science for racially/ethnically diverse students, we developed and implemented an online learning module focused on engaging N = 298 undergraduate students at a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) in an analysis of place-based soil data focused on identifying factors related to antibiotic-producing bacteria. Using a pretest-posttest study design, we found that students’ perceptions of data science relevance (Cohen’s d = 0.33) and microbiology knowledge ( d = 0.39) significantly improved. We also inductively coded qualitative survey responses to explore how students framed “relevance” and how their perceptions changed from pretest to posttest, revealing that students perceived data tools as offering new scientific insights and applications across multiple disciplines, although changes over time were not significant. Automated text analysis of students’ analytical thinking using LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count) revealed that students tended to use significantly less “discrepant” ( d =−0.22) and “tentative” ( d = −0.19) language over time, suggesting that they increased their level of certainty from pretest to posttest. We also found that students identified more relevant and specific environmental- and soil-specific variables for data investigations at posttest compared to pretest. Overall, our findings provide evidence that interdisciplinary and place-based approaches to microbiology and data literacy instruction support learning and motivation for racially/ethnically diverse groups of students.

Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Statistics Education and Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.