Audiovisual Distraction During Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

BACKGROUND: Conscious sedation is increasingly used for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER), but balancing patient comfort with sedative-related hemodynamic and neurocognitive risk remains challenging in frail older adults. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether audiovisual distraction (AVD) with video glasses reduces propofol requirements and improves patient experience during M-TEER performed under conscious sedation. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing M-TEER were assigned 1:1 to AVD (video glasses with nature documentaries and headphones) or sham control (identical inactive device). Propofol-based sedation was managed according to a uniform blinded protocol using a pragmatic Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale target of -2 to -3. The primary endpoint was the mean propofol dose (mg/kg/h). Secondary endpoints included norepinephrine use, anxiety and pain on numerical rating scales, overall patient satisfaction (measured by the German adaptation of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire), and in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: The mean propofol dose was lower with AVD than control (4.6 ± 1.6 vs 5.9 ± 1.4 mg/kg/h; P = 0.002). Norepinephrine use was numerically lower (0.5 ± 1.1 vs 1.7 ± 3.4 μg/kg/h; P = 0.08). Procedural duration, hemodynamic fluctuations, and hospital length of stay were similar. AVD reduced postprocedural anxiety (1.1 ± 1.0 vs 2.5 ± 1.7; P = 0.001) and improved satisfaction (24.7 ± 3.0 vs 22.5 ± 2.8; P = 0.005). Safety events, including bleeding, pneumonia, conversion to general anesthesia, and clinically documented delirium, were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: AVD with video glasses is a safe, pragmatic adjunct to conscious sedation in M-TEER that reduces propofol requirements and improves patient-reported comfort and satisfaction without compromising procedural efficiency or in-hospital safety. (Does audiovisual distraction reduce the need for analgesic sedation and increase patient satisfaction in patients undergoing mitral valve clipping? A randomized controlled trial; DRKS00037370).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACC Advances
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102835
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Audiovisual Distraction During Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

Roza Saraei, Thomas Stiermaier, Christoph Marquetand, Kira Erber et al.
JACC Advances
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
article

Audiovisual Distraction During Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

Roza Saraei, Thomas Stiermaier, Christoph Marquetand, Kira Erber, Felicitas Lemmer, Hannes Alessandrini, Elias Rawish, Patrick Kellner, Tobias Schmidt, Florian Genske, Mulham Alhagi, Mira John, Ingo Eitel, Anke Constantz, Christian Frerker
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conscious sedation is increasingly used for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER), but balancing patient comfort with sedative-related hemodynamic and neurocognitive risk remains challenging in frail older adults. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether audiovisual distraction (AVD) with video glasses reduces propofol requirements and improves patient experience during M-TEER performed under conscious sedation. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing M-TEER were assigned 1:1 to AVD (video glasses with nature documentaries and headphones) or sham control (identical inactive device). Propofol-based sedation was managed according to a uniform blinded protocol using a pragmatic Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale target of -2 to -3. The primary endpoint was the mean propofol dose (mg/kg/h). Secondary endpoints included norepinephrine use, anxiety and pain on numerical rating scales, overall patient satisfaction (measured by the German adaptation of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire), and in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: The mean propofol dose was lower with AVD than control (4.6 ± 1.6 vs 5.9 ± 1.4 mg/kg/h; P = 0.002). Norepinephrine use was numerically lower (0.5 ± 1.1 vs 1.7 ± 3.4 μg/kg/h; P = 0.08). Procedural duration, hemodynamic fluctuations, and hospital length of stay were similar. AVD reduced postprocedural anxiety (1.1 ± 1.0 vs 2.5 ± 1.7; P = 0.001) and improved satisfaction (24.7 ± 3.0 vs 22.5 ± 2.8; P = 0.005). Safety events, including bleeding, pneumonia, conversion to general anesthesia, and clinically documented delirium, were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: AVD with video glasses is a safe, pragmatic adjunct to conscious sedation in M-TEER that reduces propofol requirements and improves patient-reported comfort and satisfaction without compromising procedural efficiency or in-hospital safety. (Does audiovisual distraction reduce the need for analgesic sedation and increase patient satisfaction in patients undergoing mitral valve clipping? A randomized controlled trial; DRKS00037370).

JACC AdvancesVol. 5(6)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.