Longitudinal characterization of COVID-19 across a surveillance transition in Japan: thirteen epidemic waves, 2020–2025

Long-term comparison of COVID-19 epidemic waves is challenging because surveillance systems and reporting practices change over time. In Japan, official reporting shifted repeatedly between January 2020 and December 2025, from comprehensive nationwide notification to restricted reporting and sentinel-based surveillance. Using publicly available national data on reported cases and deaths, we characterized 13 epidemic waves while explicitly accounting for reporting transitions. We described weekly incidence and mortality rates per 100,000 population using population-based indicators to enable comparison across heterogeneous surveillance frameworks. Early waves showed very high observed case fatality ratios. Observed case fatality ratios declined markedly in subsequent waves, although estimates varied with reporting criteria and adjustments for reporting limitations, including periods when mild cases were excluded. Death counts were available only through week 18 of 2023, precluding evaluation of population-based mortality and observed case fatality ratios after the transition to sentinel-based surveillance. This transparent bridging framework enables longitudinal, comparability-oriented description of 13 epidemic waves in Japan across the 2023 surveillance transition. These findings should be interpreted as descriptive patterns observed under evolving surveillance contexts, and causal attribution is beyond the scope of this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-51317-0
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal characterization of COVID-19 across a surveillance transition in Japan: thirteen epidemic waves, 2020–2025

Yuri Matsubara, Masayoshi Matsumoto, Yosikazu Nakamura, Hiroshi Yanagawa et al.
Scientific Reports
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

Longitudinal characterization of COVID-19 across a surveillance transition in Japan: thirteen epidemic waves, 2020–2025

Yuri Matsubara, Masayoshi Matsumoto, Yosikazu Nakamura, Hiroshi Yanagawa, Izumi Oki, Chihiro Wakabayashi, Shiho Sato, Yoshihisa Aiba, Daisuke Matsubara, Yui Nakaizumi
article en

Abstract

Long-term comparison of COVID-19 epidemic waves is challenging because surveillance systems and reporting practices change over time. In Japan, official reporting shifted repeatedly between January 2020 and December 2025, from comprehensive nationwide notification to restricted reporting and sentinel-based surveillance. Using publicly available national data on reported cases and deaths, we characterized 13 epidemic waves while explicitly accounting for reporting transitions. We described weekly incidence and mortality rates per 100,000 population using population-based indicators to enable comparison across heterogeneous surveillance frameworks. Early waves showed very high observed case fatality ratios. Observed case fatality ratios declined markedly in subsequent waves, although estimates varied with reporting criteria and adjustments for reporting limitations, including periods when mild cases were excluded. Death counts were available only through week 18 of 2023, precluding evaluation of population-based mortality and observed case fatality ratios after the transition to sentinel-based surveillance. This transparent bridging framework enables longitudinal, comparability-oriented description of 13 epidemic waves in Japan across the 2023 surveillance transition. These findings should be interpreted as descriptive patterns observed under evolving surveillance contexts, and causal attribution is beyond the scope of this study.

Scientific Reports
Jichi Medical University (JP), Saitama Prefectural University (JP), Utsunomiya University (JP), Dokkyo Medical University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.