The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: No systematic review has yet been conducted simultaneously on the effectiveness of psychological interventions across multiple outcome measures during rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study aims to assess the effects of such interventions on pain, psychological outcomes, patient-reported knee function, objective knee measures, and quality of life following ACLR. Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 20 April 2026 (PROSPERO CRD42023483889). Eligible randomized controlled trials compared psychological interventions with usual care in ACLR patients. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data. Random-effects models were used; effect sizes were interpreted using Cohen’s guidelines. Results: Of 401 records screened, 11 RCTs (440 participants) were included. Psychological interventions significantly improved pain (six trials, SMD = −0.96, 95% CI −1.40 to −0.52, p < 0.001, I2 = 47%; large effect), kinesiophobia (TSK-11: five trials, SMD = −0.48, −0.74 to −0.22, I2 = 0%; small effect), knee self-efficacy (K-SES: three trials, SMD = 0.53, 0.19–0.86, I2 = 0%, moderate effect), patient-reported knee function (IKDC: two trials, SMD = 0.58, 0.26–0.90, I2 = 0%, moderate effect), and physical role function (SF-36: two trials, SMD = 0.41, 0.04–0.78, I2 = 0%, small effect). No significant effects were found for KT1000, knee strength, SF-36 mental well-being, or ACL-RSI (all p > 0.05, with substantial heterogeneity for ACL-RSI). Particularly, imagery therapy reduced pain (three trials, SMD = −1.54, I2 = 15%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence that psychological interventions, especially imagery therapy, may improve pain, psychological outcomes, patient-reported knee function, and quality of life after ACLR. Adequately powered trials with standardized protocols are needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103980
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

M Zhang, Bohua Li, 蒲小兵, Yi Huang et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

M Zhang, Bohua Li, 蒲小兵, Yi Huang, Jialiang Tian
article en

Abstract

Background: No systematic review has yet been conducted simultaneously on the effectiveness of psychological interventions across multiple outcome measures during rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study aims to assess the effects of such interventions on pain, psychological outcomes, patient-reported knee function, objective knee measures, and quality of life following ACLR. Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 20 April 2026 (PROSPERO CRD42023483889). Eligible randomized controlled trials compared psychological interventions with usual care in ACLR patients. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data. Random-effects models were used; effect sizes were interpreted using Cohen’s guidelines. Results: Of 401 records screened, 11 RCTs (440 participants) were included. Psychological interventions significantly improved pain (six trials, SMD = −0.96, 95% CI −1.40 to −0.52, p < 0.001, I2 = 47%; large effect), kinesiophobia (TSK-11: five trials, SMD = −0.48, −0.74 to −0.22, I2 = 0%; small effect), knee self-efficacy (K-SES: three trials, SMD = 0.53, 0.19–0.86, I2 = 0%, moderate effect), patient-reported knee function (IKDC: two trials, SMD = 0.58, 0.26–0.90, I2 = 0%, moderate effect), and physical role function (SF-36: two trials, SMD = 0.41, 0.04–0.78, I2 = 0%, small effect). No significant effects were found for KT1000, knee strength, SF-36 mental well-being, or ACL-RSI (all p > 0.05, with substantial heterogeneity for ACL-RSI). Particularly, imagery therapy reduced pain (three trials, SMD = −1.54, I2 = 15%). Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence that psychological interventions, especially imagery therapy, may improve pain, psychological outcomes, patient-reported knee function, and quality of life after ACLR. Adequately powered trials with standardized protocols are needed to confirm these findings.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(10)
Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.