Rapid adaptation of first contact physiotherapy services for musculoskeletal patients in the UK and Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multiple case study

BackgroundThe disruption of health services by the COVID-19 pandemic prompted the WHO to advocate for rapid adaptation of healthcare. Little is known about the specific rapid adaptation strategies deployed in first contact physiotherapy services (FCPS) and how they were experienced by providers and patients.Study AimTo explore views and experiences of physiotherapists and key stakeholders on the rapid adaptation of FCPS during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK and Australia.MethodsA multiple case study design was employed across four case sites; UK (n = 2), Australia (n = 2), involving online semi-structured interviews with 22 participants in 2024 and document review. A case-based approach using framework analysis was applied, drawing on the public health emergency framework of readiness, responsiveness, and sustainability, alongside the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).ResultsGaps in readiness for adaptation, particularly in terms of planning and resources, were evident across FCPS in both countries. However, the findings highlight FCPS as an adaptable service, with strategies implemented within the first three to six months following the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic. The most notable adaptation variation was in telehealth, where alignment with service contexts influenced implementation and ongoing sustainability. New challenges not fully captured within CFIR constructs emerged, including the initial lack of acceptability, particularly related to telehealth, and the unpredictable nature of the pandemic.ConclusionTo strengthen FCPS preparedness for the future, policies should proactively equip services with the resources and capabilities required to manage emergencies and associated contingencies, while accounting for contextual variations. Such forward planning would support an effective response and the long-term integration of beneficial adaptations, thereby strengthening service resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261452621
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid adaptation of first contact physiotherapy services for musculoskeletal patients in the UK and Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multiple case study

Oluwatoyin Adeniji, Theopisti Chrysanthaki, Nicola Carey, Magdalena Zasada et al.
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Rapid adaptation of first contact physiotherapy services for musculoskeletal patients in the UK and Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multiple case study

Oluwatoyin Adeniji, Theopisti Chrysanthaki, Nicola Carey, Magdalena Zasada, Karen Stenner, Evangelos Pappas
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe disruption of health services by the COVID-19 pandemic prompted the WHO to advocate for rapid adaptation of healthcare. Little is known about the specific rapid adaptation strategies deployed in first contact physiotherapy services (FCPS) and how they were experienced by providers and patients.Study AimTo explore views and experiences of physiotherapists and key stakeholders on the rapid adaptation of FCPS during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK and Australia.MethodsA multiple case study design was employed across four case sites; UK (n = 2), Australia (n = 2), involving online semi-structured interviews with 22 participants in 2024 and document review. A case-based approach using framework analysis was applied, drawing on the public health emergency framework of readiness, responsiveness, and sustainability, alongside the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).ResultsGaps in readiness for adaptation, particularly in terms of planning and resources, were evident across FCPS in both countries. However, the findings highlight FCPS as an adaptable service, with strategies implemented within the first three to six months following the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic. The most notable adaptation variation was in telehealth, where alignment with service contexts influenced implementation and ongoing sustainability. New challenges not fully captured within CFIR constructs emerged, including the initial lack of acceptability, particularly related to telehealth, and the unpredictable nature of the pandemic.ConclusionTo strengthen FCPS preparedness for the future, policies should proactively equip services with the resources and capabilities required to manage emergencies and associated contingencies, while accounting for contextual variations. Such forward planning would support an effective response and the long-term integration of beneficial adaptations, thereby strengthening service resilience.

Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Wollongong (AU), University of Surrey (GB), RMIT Europe (ES), University of the Highlands and Islands (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.