Homeostasis and causal control

Abstract Homeostasis is a core biological concept concerning the way organisms maintain quantities within a given range. Mathematical models of homeostasis build on mechanisms for feedback control from engineering. The concept of control also figures centrally in causal analysis, where it is typically linked to interventions. This paper uses dynamic causal models (Iwasaki and Simon, 1994) to bridge these three domains, leading to the correction of a misunderstanding common in all of them. In each, control is regularly understood as aiming to maintain certain variables at constant values. Yet paradigm control feedback and homeostatic mechanisms do not maintain these variables constant, and intervening on them would destroy the mechanisms’ functions. Instead of focusing on how feedback loops allegedly maintain constancy, dynamic causal models reveal how control systems exploit such lower-scale feedback loops to produce higher-scale causal relationships. The discussion points toward a novel engineering-inspired approach to causal inference, and clarifies how biological and engineered systems combine existing mechanisms to perform increasingly complex functions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology & Philosophy
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-026-10018-8
Primary Topic
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Homeostasis and causal control

Naftali Weinberger
Biology & Philosophy
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
article

Homeostasis and causal control

Naftali Weinberger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Homeostasis is a core biological concept concerning the way organisms maintain quantities within a given range. Mathematical models of homeostasis build on mechanisms for feedback control from engineering. The concept of control also figures centrally in causal analysis, where it is typically linked to interventions. This paper uses dynamic causal models (Iwasaki and Simon, 1994) to bridge these three domains, leading to the correction of a misunderstanding common in all of them. In each, control is regularly understood as aiming to maintain certain variables at constant values. Yet paradigm control feedback and homeostatic mechanisms do not maintain these variables constant, and intervening on them would destroy the mechanisms’ functions. Instead of focusing on how feedback loops allegedly maintain constancy, dynamic causal models reveal how control systems exploit such lower-scale feedback loops to produce higher-scale causal relationships. The discussion points toward a novel engineering-inspired approach to causal inference, and clarifies how biological and engineered systems combine existing mechanisms to perform increasingly complex functions.

Biology & PhilosophyVol. 41(2)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Johns Hopkins University, University of Oxford, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.