Patterns of suicidal ideation disclosure among acute psychiatric inpatients

Prior literature has explored disclosure of suicidality to formal and informal sources, identifying reasons for nondisclosure (e.g., fear of rejection, shame, and hospitalization); however, existing research is limited to retrospective data, often collected months or years after suicide attempts have occurred. The present study seeks to address this gap by identifying patterns of nondisclosure among recent suicide attempters within a one-week period following the attempt, shortening the temporal distance from event to recall. Adult psychiatric inpatients (N = 39, 38.5% female, 61.5% White) who had attempted suicide within the past seven days were recruited from a large urban hospital system in New York. At intake, patients completed a self-report questionnaire, which included two questions on suicidal ideation (SI) disclosure. Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR) methodology was used to extract and categorize reasons for nondisclosure. Nearly half of the patients (46.2%) reported not disclosing their suicidal intentions prior to their suicide attempt. Four key themes emerged as reasons for nondisclosure: fear of stigma (27.8%), fear of consequences such as involuntary hospitalization (22.3%), social isolation and lack of confidants (22.3%), and impulsivity (16.7%). Future research should examine targeted interventions to improve disclosure and explore how different disclosure patterns influence treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of General Psychiatry
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-026-00669-y
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of suicidal ideation disclosure among acute psychiatric inpatients

Erica R. Garagiola, Hannah Lawrence, I I Galynker, Sara Bloch-Elkouby et al.
Annals of General Psychiatry
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Patterns of suicidal ideation disclosure among acute psychiatric inpatients

Erica R. Garagiola, Hannah Lawrence, I I Galynker, Sara Bloch-Elkouby, Victoria Witerska, Yukti Bhatt, Talia Rosen
article en

Abstract

Prior literature has explored disclosure of suicidality to formal and informal sources, identifying reasons for nondisclosure (e.g., fear of rejection, shame, and hospitalization); however, existing research is limited to retrospective data, often collected months or years after suicide attempts have occurred. The present study seeks to address this gap by identifying patterns of nondisclosure among recent suicide attempters within a one-week period following the attempt, shortening the temporal distance from event to recall. Adult psychiatric inpatients (N = 39, 38.5% female, 61.5% White) who had attempted suicide within the past seven days were recruited from a large urban hospital system in New York. At intake, patients completed a self-report questionnaire, which included two questions on suicidal ideation (SI) disclosure. Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR) methodology was used to extract and categorize reasons for nondisclosure. Nearly half of the patients (46.2%) reported not disclosing their suicidal intentions prior to their suicide attempt. Four key themes emerged as reasons for nondisclosure: fear of stigma (27.8%), fear of consequences such as involuntary hospitalization (22.3%), social isolation and lack of confidants (22.3%), and impulsivity (16.7%). Future research should examine targeted interventions to improve disclosure and explore how different disclosure patterns influence treatment outcomes.

Annals of General Psychiatry
Yeshiva University (US), Columbia University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.