Impact of Prior Diabetic Retinal Screening on Hospitalization and Ophthalmic Follow-Up in Diabetic Patients with Newly Diagnosed Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Background/Objectives: This retrospective cohort study compared hospitalization and follow-up rates in patients with newly diagnosed proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) versus those without prior diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening. Methods: Using TriNetX, a global electronic health record database, 57,964 patients aged ≥ 40 years with type 2 diabetes and newly diagnosed PDR without diabetic macular edema (DME) requiring panretinal photocoagulation or intravitreal injection were included. Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of prior DR screening in the last 5 years and balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Primary outcomes included 30-, 60-, and 90-day hospitalization rates and repeat ophthalmic follow-up as estimated using repeat PDR diagnosis codes and repeat retinal imaging codes, including OCT, fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography. Results: Of 57,964 patients, 25,003 had no prior DR screening and 32,961 had prior DR screening. After matching, 19,316 patients were included per cohort. Patients without known DR screening had significantly higher hospitalization rates at 30 days (RR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.67–1.89), 60 days (RR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.51–1.67), and 90 days (RR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.44–1.58), and lower repeat ophthalmic visits by PDR codes at 30 days (RR = 0.458, 95% CI 0.440–0.476), 60 days (RR = 0.450, 95% CI 0.437–0.463) and 90 days (RR = 0.420, 95% CI 0.408–0.432) or by repeat retinal imaging codes at 30 days (RR = 0.450, 95% CI 0.423–0.478), 60 days (RR = 0.394, 95% CI 0.377–0.411), and 90 days (RR = 0.381, 95% CI 0.366–0.396) (all p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Absence of known prior DR screening in PDR patients is associated with higher hospitalization risk and reduced ophthalmic follow-up, suggesting that a lack of screening indicates broader gaps in healthcare engagement and disease control. Tailored strategies are needed to prevent vision loss as well as systemic complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16101562
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Prior Diabetic Retinal Screening on Hospitalization and Ophthalmic Follow-Up in Diabetic Patients with Newly Diagnosed Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Neel Sonik, Ninel Z. Gregori, Jason C. Fan, Jonathan B. Lin et al.
Diagnostics
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Impact of Prior Diabetic Retinal Screening on Hospitalization and Ophthalmic Follow-Up in Diabetic Patients with Newly Diagnosed Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Neel Sonik, Ninel Z. Gregori, Jason C. Fan, Jonathan B. Lin, Georges AbouKasm, Charles Zhang, Zoe J. Tsoukas
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This retrospective cohort study compared hospitalization and follow-up rates in patients with newly diagnosed proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) versus those without prior diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening. Methods: Using TriNetX, a global electronic health record database, 57,964 patients aged ≥ 40 years with type 2 diabetes and newly diagnosed PDR without diabetic macular edema (DME) requiring panretinal photocoagulation or intravitreal injection were included. Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of prior DR screening in the last 5 years and balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Primary outcomes included 30-, 60-, and 90-day hospitalization rates and repeat ophthalmic follow-up as estimated using repeat PDR diagnosis codes and repeat retinal imaging codes, including OCT, fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography. Results: Of 57,964 patients, 25,003 had no prior DR screening and 32,961 had prior DR screening. After matching, 19,316 patients were included per cohort. Patients without known DR screening had significantly higher hospitalization rates at 30 days (RR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.67–1.89), 60 days (RR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.51–1.67), and 90 days (RR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.44–1.58), and lower repeat ophthalmic visits by PDR codes at 30 days (RR = 0.458, 95% CI 0.440–0.476), 60 days (RR = 0.450, 95% CI 0.437–0.463) and 90 days (RR = 0.420, 95% CI 0.408–0.432) or by repeat retinal imaging codes at 30 days (RR = 0.450, 95% CI 0.423–0.478), 60 days (RR = 0.394, 95% CI 0.377–0.411), and 90 days (RR = 0.381, 95% CI 0.366–0.396) (all p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Absence of known prior DR screening in PDR patients is associated with higher hospitalization risk and reduced ophthalmic follow-up, suggesting that a lack of screening indicates broader gaps in healthcare engagement and disease control. Tailored strategies are needed to prevent vision loss as well as systemic complications.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(10)
University of Miami (US), Duke University (US), Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.