Material Homogeneity Criterion for Assessing Heterogeneous High-Strength Steel Joints with Austenitic Welds

The modernization of global energy infrastructure within the Industry 5.0 framework requires the use of high-strength steels and reliable joining technologies to ensure safe, sustainable pipeline transport. This study focuses on the analysis of heterogeneous welded joints formed between high-strength alloy steel (34KhN2MA/EN 34CrNiMo6) and an austenitic welded seam (ER 307). While austenitic welds mitigate the risk of cold cracking, they introduce significant structural and mechanical heterogeneity. To address this, the research proposes and validates a material homogeneity criterion (MHC) derived from the LM-hardness methodology. By analyzing the statistical dispersion of macrohardness (HRC) through indicators such as the Weibull homogeneity coefficient (m) and the coefficient of variation (ν), the study establishes a quantitative approach to assess material degradation and structural uniformity across key weld zones. Results demonstrate that macrohardness profiling effectively distinguishes between structurally heterogeneous regions near the weld axis characterized by low homogeneity coefficients (m = 4.04 < 10, Am = 0.742 < 0.878), elevated variability (ν = 29.68% > 11.6%), and high technological damageability (D = 0.92 > 0.81, jD = 11.87 > 4.38) with pronounced step-like variation in macrohardness (HRC ∈ [12.6; 47]), on the one hand, and stabilized homogeneous zones in the base material, where m = 24.89 > 10, Am = 0.947 > 0.878, ν = 4.39% < 11.6%, D = 0.52 ⟶ 0, jD = 1.09 ⟶ 0, and characteristic range of HRC = 47–55, on the other hand. This methodology provides a robust, quasi-non-destructive tool for enhancing predictive maintenance, digital twins, and the overall integrity management of “smart” pipeline systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machines
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14050577
Primary Topic
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Material Homogeneity Criterion for Assessing Heterogeneous High-Strength Steel Joints with Austenitic Welds

Vitalii Ivanov, А. R. Dzyubyk, Ярослав Маркіянович Кусий, Nazarii Kusen et al.
Machines
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
article

Material Homogeneity Criterion for Assessing Heterogeneous High-Strength Steel Joints with Austenitic Welds

Vitalii Ivanov, А. R. Dzyubyk, Ярослав Маркіянович Кусий, Nazarii Kusen, J.C. Hajduk
article en

Abstract

The modernization of global energy infrastructure within the Industry 5.0 framework requires the use of high-strength steels and reliable joining technologies to ensure safe, sustainable pipeline transport. This study focuses on the analysis of heterogeneous welded joints formed between high-strength alloy steel (34KhN2MA/EN 34CrNiMo6) and an austenitic welded seam (ER 307). While austenitic welds mitigate the risk of cold cracking, they introduce significant structural and mechanical heterogeneity. To address this, the research proposes and validates a material homogeneity criterion (MHC) derived from the LM-hardness methodology. By analyzing the statistical dispersion of macrohardness (HRC) through indicators such as the Weibull homogeneity coefficient (m) and the coefficient of variation (ν), the study establishes a quantitative approach to assess material degradation and structural uniformity across key weld zones. Results demonstrate that macrohardness profiling effectively distinguishes between structurally heterogeneous regions near the weld axis characterized by low homogeneity coefficients (m = 4.04 < 10, Am = 0.742 < 0.878), elevated variability (ν = 29.68% > 11.6%), and high technological damageability (D = 0.92 > 0.81, jD = 11.87 > 4.38) with pronounced step-like variation in macrohardness (HRC ∈ [12.6; 47]), on the one hand, and stabilized homogeneous zones in the base material, where m = 24.89 > 10, Am = 0.947 > 0.878, ν = 4.39% < 11.6%, D = 0.52 ⟶ 0, jD = 1.09 ⟶ 0, and characteristic range of HRC = 47–55, on the other hand. This methodology provides a robust, quasi-non-destructive tool for enhancing predictive maintenance, digital twins, and the overall integrity management of “smart” pipeline systems.

MachinesVol. 14(5)
Seat (Spain) (ES), Sumy State University (UA), WSB University (PL), Lviv Polytechnic National University (UA)
European Commission, Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.