Reviewing ecosystems of evidence: synthesising the evidence on the commercial determinants of health from a complex systems perspective

The Commercial Determinants of Health (CDoH) are the systems, practices, and pathways through which commercial actors drive health and equity. This includes their influence on systems of evidence production and dissemination (evidence ecosystems) in order to protect and promote commercial interests. In the Commercial Determinants of Health and Evidence Synthesis (CODES) methodological guidance, we provided advice for conducing CDoH relevant evidence syntheses, from developing a protocol to reporting the review and planning an update. This follow-up paper considers reasons and practical implications for integrating a complex systems perspective in such reviews. This commentary describes how a complex systems perspective can benefit research, including evidence synthesis related to the CDoH, by embracing the complexity of the real world, understanding interventions in context, rendering visible the corporate playbook, and exposing the power dynamics that drive inequity. We then reflect on the practical implications of adopting a complex systems approach in CDoH evidence synthesis, including drawing on a systems lens and/or incorporating specific systems methods in the review. This commentary complements existing CODES guidance in highlighting considerations for conducting CDoH relevant evidence synthesis from a complex systems perspective. It can help interpreting such reviews and raise awareness of how commercial actors can shape evidence ecosystems, particularly evidence synthesis. Having a robust evidence base that considers systems elements and dynamics will support effective action to address the CDoH, improve public health and reduce inequity at scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic Reviews
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03187-w
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reviewing ecosystems of evidence: synthesising the evidence on the commercial determinants of health from a complex systems perspective

Cécile Knai, Laurence Blanchard, R. E. Glover, James Thomas et al.
Systematic Reviews
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Reviewing ecosystems of evidence: synthesising the evidence on the commercial determinants of health from a complex systems perspective

Cécile Knai, Laurence Blanchard, R. E. Glover, James Thomas, Éadaoin Cott, Harry Rutter, NASON MAANI, Mark Petticrew, May C. I. van Schalkwyk, Vivian Welch, Alice Tompson
article en

Abstract

The Commercial Determinants of Health (CDoH) are the systems, practices, and pathways through which commercial actors drive health and equity. This includes their influence on systems of evidence production and dissemination (evidence ecosystems) in order to protect and promote commercial interests. In the Commercial Determinants of Health and Evidence Synthesis (CODES) methodological guidance, we provided advice for conducing CDoH relevant evidence syntheses, from developing a protocol to reporting the review and planning an update. This follow-up paper considers reasons and practical implications for integrating a complex systems perspective in such reviews. This commentary describes how a complex systems perspective can benefit research, including evidence synthesis related to the CDoH, by embracing the complexity of the real world, understanding interventions in context, rendering visible the corporate playbook, and exposing the power dynamics that drive inequity. We then reflect on the practical implications of adopting a complex systems approach in CDoH evidence synthesis, including drawing on a systems lens and/or incorporating specific systems methods in the review. This commentary complements existing CODES guidance in highlighting considerations for conducting CDoH relevant evidence synthesis from a complex systems perspective. It can help interpreting such reviews and raise awareness of how commercial actors can shape evidence ecosystems, particularly evidence synthesis. Having a robust evidence base that considers systems elements and dynamics will support effective action to address the CDoH, improve public health and reduce inequity at scale.

Systematic ReviewsVol. 15(1)
University of Ottawa (CA), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Faculty of Public Health (GB), Bruyère (CA), University College London (GB), University of Bath (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Health and Care Research Wales, UK Research and Innovation, Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.