Electromagnetic-guided nasogastric tube insertion by nurses: a multicenter non-inferiority study

BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube feeding is essential for critically ill patients, yet blind insertion risks misplacement and related complications. Electromagnetic guidance enables real-time tracking, potentially enhancing safety and efficiency. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of nurse-led electromagnetic-guided nasogastric tube insertion with those of physician-performed blind insertion in critically ill patients. METHODS: This multicenter prospective non-inferiority trial was conducted in seven Japanese ICUs (July 2023-February 2025). Physicians performed blind insertions in the initial phase, followed by nurse training and electromagnetic-guided insertions using the CORTRAK system. The primary outcome was successful gastric placement without special techniques. Secondary outcomes included insertion time, attempts, complications, and tube position. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients were analyzed (141 electromagnetic-guided, 142 blind). Success rates were similar (63.1% vs 65.5%; difference -2.4%, 95% CI -13.5 to 8.8), confirming non-inferiority (Farrington-Manning P=0.001). Electromagnetic-guided insertions required fewer reinsertions (median 0 vs 1; P=0.049) and less time (3.3 vs 4.5 min; P=0.03) in unadjusted analyses. No tracheobronchial misplacements occurred (blind: 1.4%). Complication rates were low and comparable. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led electromagnetic-guided nasogastric tube insertion appears to be a safe, effective alternative to physician blind insertion, with comparable success and potential efficiency advantages.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000552563
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electromagnetic-guided nasogastric tube insertion by nurses: a multicenter non-inferiority study

Masako Shirasaka, Kazunao Mori, Kenichi Sai, Junko Tatsuno et al.
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Electromagnetic-guided nasogastric tube insertion by nurses: a multicenter non-inferiority study

Masako Shirasaka, Kazunao Mori, Kenichi Sai, Junko Tatsuno, Saori Kajiwara, Saiko Okamoto, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Megumi Kamogawa, Tomomi Yoshida, Hitoshi Tsugu, Shinya Sakamoto, Toshifumi Miki, Daisuke Yamaguchi, Tomoaki Ikezawa, Hideki Hashimoto, Hideaki Note, Kensuke Nakamura
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube feeding is essential for critically ill patients, yet blind insertion risks misplacement and related complications. Electromagnetic guidance enables real-time tracking, potentially enhancing safety and efficiency. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of nurse-led electromagnetic-guided nasogastric tube insertion with those of physician-performed blind insertion in critically ill patients. METHODS: This multicenter prospective non-inferiority trial was conducted in seven Japanese ICUs (July 2023-February 2025). Physicians performed blind insertions in the initial phase, followed by nurse training and electromagnetic-guided insertions using the CORTRAK system. The primary outcome was successful gastric placement without special techniques. Secondary outcomes included insertion time, attempts, complications, and tube position. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients were analyzed (141 electromagnetic-guided, 142 blind). Success rates were similar (63.1% vs 65.5%; difference -2.4%, 95% CI -13.5 to 8.8), confirming non-inferiority (Farrington-Manning P=0.001). Electromagnetic-guided insertions required fewer reinsertions (median 0 vs 1; P=0.049) and less time (3.3 vs 4.5 min; P=0.03) in unadjusted analyses. No tracheobronchial misplacements occurred (blind: 1.4%). Complication rates were low and comparable. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led electromagnetic-guided nasogastric tube insertion appears to be a safe, effective alternative to physician blind insertion, with comparable success and potential efficiency advantages.

Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.