Acceptability and usability of a respiratory biosensor for drug overdose detection and first responder notification: a qualitative evaluation of perspectives from people who use drugs and wider stakeholders

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Overdose induced by illicit drug use is a significant public health threat in many settings globally. Many such overdoses occur in the context of lone use in private spaces, in the absence of potential first responders. Chest-worn biosensors have the potential to detect respiratory depression which signal overdose and alert first responders, enabling rapid reversal. However, the acceptability of this approach to people who use drugs and other key stakeholders are not known. We aimed to investigate these outcomes in this qualitative sub-study, which is part of a larger trial investigating this intervention. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with participants who completed the study protocol (n = 20), partially completed the study protocol (n = 1) and stakeholder groups (n = 8) about device acceptability. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Factors influencing device acceptability for PWUD were interpreted using the concepts of the COM-B behaviour model. Discussions around implementation with stakeholder groups utilised Normalisation Process Theory to further appraise the intervention and its integration into existing services. RESULTS: Experiences with overdose or drug-related deaths (DRD) were identified within qualitative data as motivating factors for device wear. First responder groups stressed the importance of patient choice and device accuracy. The accelerometer sensor was found to be acceptable to people who use drugs (PWUD) and was utilised to monitor respiratory patterns. Stakeholders recognised the potential of these devices to play a part in the management of overdose and identified necessary requirements to ensure successful implementation of the device, such as funding allocation, potential barriers and integration into existing services. CONCLUSIONS: The chest-worn biosensor was acceptable to PWUD, driven by personal experiences with overdose risks, and were viewed by stakeholders as a promising tool for overdose management. Successful implementation will require ensuring device accuracy, respecting patient choice, securing funding, and integrating the technology into existing services. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Researchregistry7351.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harm Reduction Journal
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-026-01452-8
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability and usability of a respiratory biosensor for drug overdose detection and first responder notification: a qualitative evaluation of perspectives from people who use drugs and wider stakeholders

Osian Meredith, Kristina Hnízdilová, Madeleine Caven, Andrew Radley et al.
Harm Reduction Journal
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Acceptability and usability of a respiratory biosensor for drug overdose detection and first responder notification: a qualitative evaluation of perspectives from people who use drugs and wider stakeholders

Osian Meredith, Kristina Hnízdilová, Madeleine Caven, Andrew Radley, Christopher Byrne, John Francis Dillon, Bruce Henderson, Brian Paul Stephens
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Overdose induced by illicit drug use is a significant public health threat in many settings globally. Many such overdoses occur in the context of lone use in private spaces, in the absence of potential first responders. Chest-worn biosensors have the potential to detect respiratory depression which signal overdose and alert first responders, enabling rapid reversal. However, the acceptability of this approach to people who use drugs and other key stakeholders are not known. We aimed to investigate these outcomes in this qualitative sub-study, which is part of a larger trial investigating this intervention. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with participants who completed the study protocol (n = 20), partially completed the study protocol (n = 1) and stakeholder groups (n = 8) about device acceptability. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Factors influencing device acceptability for PWUD were interpreted using the concepts of the COM-B behaviour model. Discussions around implementation with stakeholder groups utilised Normalisation Process Theory to further appraise the intervention and its integration into existing services. RESULTS: Experiences with overdose or drug-related deaths (DRD) were identified within qualitative data as motivating factors for device wear. First responder groups stressed the importance of patient choice and device accuracy. The accelerometer sensor was found to be acceptable to people who use drugs (PWUD) and was utilised to monitor respiratory patterns. Stakeholders recognised the potential of these devices to play a part in the management of overdose and identified necessary requirements to ensure successful implementation of the device, such as funding allocation, potential barriers and integration into existing services. CONCLUSIONS: The chest-worn biosensor was acceptable to PWUD, driven by personal experiences with overdose risks, and were viewed by stakeholders as a promising tool for overdose management. Successful implementation will require ensuring device accuracy, respecting patient choice, securing funding, and integrating the technology into existing services. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Researchregistry7351.

Harm Reduction Journal
University of St Andrews (GB), University of Dundee (GB), NHS Tayside (GB), Ninewells Hospital (GB), Glasgow Life (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.