COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE APPROACH IN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE GAMBIA–CASAMANCE BORDER REGION

The study examines community perceptions of how the New Public Governance (NPG) approach is applied to conflict management in the Gambia–Casamance selected border villages of Darsilameh, Dimbaya, and Giboroh-Koto in the Kombo Central and Kombo East of the Gambia respectively. These communities have reportedly experienced communal land disputes, and cross-border insecurity. A qualitative case study design was adopted, with data collected from 35 community participants, and 30 security personnel from relevant security and government institutions. Data collection methods included one-on-one interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis. Thematic codes were developed and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) framework, supported by NVivo 12 software, to generate key themes and insights. The study addresses empirical gap-limited context-specific evidence from the Senegambia borderlands-and a conceptual gap relating to the integration of NPG principles with indigenous conflict management systems. Findings indicate that NPG enhances conflict management through networked collaboration, participatory governance, and the integration of indigenous practices such as joking relationships (sanankuyaa), which foster social cohesion and informal mediation. Cross-border cooperation, including joint patrols and institutional coordination, further strengthens mutual trust and positive security outcomes. However, the effectiveness of NPG is constrained by elite dominance, resource limitations, and institutional fragmentation. The study highlights the need for more inclusive governance structures, stronger sub-regional policy harmonization, and safeguards against elite capture. It concludes that hybrid governance models-combining formal institutional frameworks with culturally embedded practices-offer a more sustainable approach to conflict management in fragile border contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82403/0ay4-yy54
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE APPROACH IN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE GAMBIA–CASAMANCE BORDER REGION

Banna Sawaneh, Kebba Gibba
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE APPROACH IN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE GAMBIA–CASAMANCE BORDER REGION

Banna Sawaneh, Kebba Gibba
article en

Abstract

The study examines community perceptions of how the New Public Governance (NPG) approach is applied to conflict management in the Gambia–Casamance selected border villages of Darsilameh, Dimbaya, and Giboroh-Koto in the Kombo Central and Kombo East of the Gambia respectively. These communities have reportedly experienced communal land disputes, and cross-border insecurity. A qualitative case study design was adopted, with data collected from 35 community participants, and 30 security personnel from relevant security and government institutions. Data collection methods included one-on-one interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis. Thematic codes were developed and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) framework, supported by NVivo 12 software, to generate key themes and insights. The study addresses empirical gap-limited context-specific evidence from the Senegambia borderlands-and a conceptual gap relating to the integration of NPG principles with indigenous conflict management systems. Findings indicate that NPG enhances conflict management through networked collaboration, participatory governance, and the integration of indigenous practices such as joking relationships (sanankuyaa), which foster social cohesion and informal mediation. Cross-border cooperation, including joint patrols and institutional coordination, further strengthens mutual trust and positive security outcomes. However, the effectiveness of NPG is constrained by elite dominance, resource limitations, and institutional fragmentation. The study highlights the need for more inclusive governance structures, stronger sub-regional policy harmonization, and safeguards against elite capture. It concludes that hybrid governance models-combining formal institutional frameworks with culturally embedded practices-offer a more sustainable approach to conflict management in fragile border contexts.

University of the Gambia (GM)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE APPROACH IN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE GAMBIA–CASAMANCE BORDER REGION — Banna Sawaneh, Kebba Gibba · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS