The Truth Contract: Pre-commit Verification as Research Integrity Infrastructure for Independent ML Researchers

Independent ML researchers do not get peer review, adversarial collaborators, or institutional ethics boards. The gap shows up as inflated claims, hallucinated citations, and silent rewrites of past failure. I describe a lightweight integrity layer for this setting, the Truth Contract: a project-level SOUL.md document declaring forbidden phrasings, a pre-commit hook truth-lint that scans diffs and commit messages for violations, and an auto-citation verifier that blocks publish until every bibliography entry resolves against a primary source. I describe the Mercury project's 24-hour sprint as a case study, including a real failure mode where two preprints went to permanent DOIs with bibliography errors that the verifier would have caught had it been wired in at the start. The Truth Contract did not prevent the failure; it caught the failure within hours and forced a corrigendum. That is what I claim it is for. Companion records: Mercury method (10.5281/zenodo.20313154), Mercury-Viewer dataset (10.5281/zenodo.20313150).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20313796
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Truth Contract: Pre-commit Verification as Research Integrity Infrastructure for Independent ML Researchers

Ho Yiing Chen
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scientific Computing and Data Management
preprint

The Truth Contract: Pre-commit Verification as Research Integrity Infrastructure for Independent ML Researchers

Ho Yiing Chen
preprint en

Abstract

Independent ML researchers do not get peer review, adversarial collaborators, or institutional ethics boards. The gap shows up as inflated claims, hallucinated citations, and silent rewrites of past failure. I describe a lightweight integrity layer for this setting, the Truth Contract: a project-level SOUL.md document declaring forbidden phrasings, a pre-commit hook truth-lint that scans diffs and commit messages for violations, and an auto-citation verifier that blocks publish until every bibliography entry resolves against a primary source. I describe the Mercury project's 24-hour sprint as a case study, including a real failure mode where two preprints went to permanent DOIs with bibliography errors that the verifier would have caught had it been wired in at the start. The Truth Contract did not prevent the failure; it caught the failure within hours and forced a corrigendum. That is what I claim it is for. Companion records: Mercury method (10.5281/zenodo.20313154), Mercury-Viewer dataset (10.5281/zenodo.20313150).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
TiGenix (Spain) (ES)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.