Surgeon Preferences and Outcome Predictions for Displaced Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Survey of 151 Surgeons Making 4,832 Treatment Predictions Based on Patient Profiles and Radiographs

Purpose: Vital elderly patients with substantially displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures often undergo surgical treatment, while those with notable comorbidities or less severe fractures are generally treated nonsurgically.As guidelines leave room for interpretation, surgeons must rely on intuition and experience when making treatment decisions.This study explores surgeons' treatment preferences, expectations regarding outcomes, and their ability to predict functional outcomes.Methods: An online survey was conducted among Dutch trauma and orthopedic surgeons.Participants evaluated 16 patient profiles derived from a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery with cast immobilization.Each profile included patient characteristics and radiographs.Surgeons, blinded to the actual treatments and outcomes, indicated their treatment preference and predicted the expected outcomes for both treatment options.Results: A total of 151 surgeons made 4,832 treatment outcome predictions.Participants generally preferred surgical treatment for certain patient profiles and expected more favorable outcomes after surgery than after cast immobilization.However, only 51.5% of outcome predictions corresponding to the actual treatment were correct.No significant differences in predictive accuracy were observed between hand and wrist specialists, other consultants(not specifically hand and wrist specialists), and residents.Conclusions: Orthopedic and trauma surgeons, regardless of subspecialty or experience, demonstrated limited ability to predict functional outcomes for elderly patients with displaced distal radius fractures based on written information and radiographs.With only 51.5% of predictions correct, accuracy did not meaningfully exceed chance.Surgeons generally favored surgical treatment and expected better outcomes than with casting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.101030
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgeon Preferences and Outcome Predictions for Displaced Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Survey of 151 Surgeons Making 4,832 Treatment Predictions Based on Patient Profiles and Radiographs

Koen Dullaert, R. J. Hillen, Pepijn Krielen, M.P. Somford et al.
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Surgeon Preferences and Outcome Predictions for Displaced Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Survey of 151 Surgeons Making 4,832 Treatment Predictions Based on Patient Profiles and Radiographs

Koen Dullaert, R. J. Hillen, Pepijn Krielen, M.P. Somford, Nicky Stoop, P Kalmet, Arthur J. Kievit, Willemijn Spierenburg, Niels Laas, M. V. Nijenhuis, Jan K. G. Louwerens, Sander Koëter, Oscar E. C. van Maarseveen, Rutger G. Zuurmond, Tim Kraal, Ronald A.W. Verhagen, Anne J. H. Vochteloo, Teun Teunis, Lysanne van Silfhout, Pieter H.J. Bullens, Lucas Timmermans, David Visser, Jasper G Gerbers, Tim A. E. J. Boymans, Geert Meermans, Dirk P. ter Meulen, T.D. Berendes, Ante Prkić, Bart ten Brinke, Nina Burgert, Clinton van Trikt, Matthias Schafroth, K. Velde, Pim A.D. van Dijk, Diederik P. J. Smeeing, Joost W. Colaris, J. Vermeulen, Charlie Sewalt, Bernard Schutte, Nienke W. Willigenburg, Michiel E.R. Bongers, Malou E. Slichter, Lisa Worner, Mark H.F. Keulen, Niels W.L. Schep, Nick J.H.M. In den Kleef, J. Hoffman, Michaël P.A. Bus, Christiaan J.A. van Bergen, W.J. van Doorn, Luuk de Wert, M.P. van de Kerkhove, Pieter B. de Witte, A.J. Dijkstra, R. Onstenk, Rudolf W. Poolman, Bart Lambert, M. Dietvorst, Henk A. Formijne Jonkers, Jelle P. van der List, Thomas P.A. Baltes, Jan Paul Frölke, Joost TP. Kortlever, W.R. Spanjersberg, J. Duijff, Liesbeth E.A. Boonstra, Duncan E. Meuffels, Stein J. Janssen, Jochem M. Hoogendoorn, Jaap J. Tolk, J.C. Goslings, T.P. Saltzherr, Louis de Jong, Claudia Lowik, Diederik H. Kempen, P. van der Zwaal, Arne Berger, Charles Stevens
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Vital elderly patients with substantially displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures often undergo surgical treatment, while those with notable comorbidities or less severe fractures are generally treated nonsurgically.As guidelines leave room for interpretation, surgeons must rely on intuition and experience when making treatment decisions.This study explores surgeons' treatment preferences, expectations regarding outcomes, and their ability to predict functional outcomes.Methods: An online survey was conducted among Dutch trauma and orthopedic surgeons.Participants evaluated 16 patient profiles derived from a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery with cast immobilization.Each profile included patient characteristics and radiographs.Surgeons, blinded to the actual treatments and outcomes, indicated their treatment preference and predicted the expected outcomes for both treatment options.Results: A total of 151 surgeons made 4,832 treatment outcome predictions.Participants generally preferred surgical treatment for certain patient profiles and expected more favorable outcomes after surgery than after cast immobilization.However, only 51.5% of outcome predictions corresponding to the actual treatment were correct.No significant differences in predictive accuracy were observed between hand and wrist specialists, other consultants(not specifically hand and wrist specialists), and residents.Conclusions: Orthopedic and trauma surgeons, regardless of subspecialty or experience, demonstrated limited ability to predict functional outcomes for elderly patients with displaced distal radius fractures based on written information and radiographs.With only 51.5% of predictions correct, accuracy did not meaningfully exceed chance.Surgeons generally favored surgical treatment and expected better outcomes than with casting.

Journal of Hand Surgery Global OnlineVol. 8(4)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), OLVG (NL), Maasstad Ziekenhuis (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.