Trends in EU regulatory assessment of oncology medicines

BACKGROUND: During marketing authorisation applications (MAAs), regulators assess extensive data, identifying issues and uncertainties requiring clarification before a medicine reaches the market. Despite structured reviews, quantitative evaluation of regulatory assessment complexity remains limited, constraining systematic insights into challenges of assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Focusing on oncology, this study analysed the regulatory complexity of MAAs submitted to the European Medicines Agency, based mainly on the number of distinct issues raised during initial dossier assessment. Issues were disaggregated into quality, nonclinical, and clinical domains to identify primary drivers of complexity, temporal trends, and product- or pathway-specific differences. As a complementary measure, European public assessment report (EPAR) length was examined as the final public documentation of the assessment outcome. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2024, the number of issues increased substantially across all domains (+60%), most prominently clinical issues, driven largely by efficacy-related concerns. Advanced therapy medicinal products generated more quality-related issues, reflecting complex manufacturing, whereas tumour-agnostic indications elicited more clinical issues, consistent with paradigm-shifting trial designs. Conditional marketing authorisation, introduced to manage uncertainty, was associated with higher overall issue counts. Trends in EPAR length paralleled those observed for clinical issue counts, indicating that regulatory assessment complexity during initial review is reflected in the final public documentation. CONCLUSIONS: The growing number of distinct issues raised during initial dossier assessment highlights a marked increase in regulatory complexity in oncology MAAs over the past decade. The measures capture both product-specific and systemic procedural influences, providing a quantitative foundation to inform resource allocation, process optimisation, and regulatory strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.107732
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in EU regulatory assessment of oncology medicines

H. Enzmann, T. Pabsch, F. Pignatti, F. Day et al.
ESMO Open
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Trends in EU regulatory assessment of oncology medicines

H. Enzmann, T. Pabsch, F. Pignatti, F. Day, B. Sepodes
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During marketing authorisation applications (MAAs), regulators assess extensive data, identifying issues and uncertainties requiring clarification before a medicine reaches the market. Despite structured reviews, quantitative evaluation of regulatory assessment complexity remains limited, constraining systematic insights into challenges of assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Focusing on oncology, this study analysed the regulatory complexity of MAAs submitted to the European Medicines Agency, based mainly on the number of distinct issues raised during initial dossier assessment. Issues were disaggregated into quality, nonclinical, and clinical domains to identify primary drivers of complexity, temporal trends, and product- or pathway-specific differences. As a complementary measure, European public assessment report (EPAR) length was examined as the final public documentation of the assessment outcome. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2024, the number of issues increased substantially across all domains (+60%), most prominently clinical issues, driven largely by efficacy-related concerns. Advanced therapy medicinal products generated more quality-related issues, reflecting complex manufacturing, whereas tumour-agnostic indications elicited more clinical issues, consistent with paradigm-shifting trial designs. Conditional marketing authorisation, introduced to manage uncertainty, was associated with higher overall issue counts. Trends in EPAR length paralleled those observed for clinical issue counts, indicating that regulatory assessment complexity during initial review is reflected in the final public documentation. CONCLUSIONS: The growing number of distinct issues raised during initial dossier assessment highlights a marked increase in regulatory complexity in oncology MAAs over the past decade. The measures capture both product-specific and systemic procedural influences, providing a quantitative foundation to inform resource allocation, process optimisation, and regulatory strategy.

ESMO OpenVol. 11(6)
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (DE), European Medicines Agency (NL), University of Lisbon (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.