Apples and Oranges: Exaggerated Multiple Religious Belief in East Asia

ABSTRACT Recent scholarship proposes that East Asians commonly hold multiple religious beliefs simultaneously, even when they report a single religious identity or none at all. This note argues that this claim is substantially exaggerated due to a measurement mismatch: What Global East Survey (GES)‐based studies operationalize as religious belief is better understood as ambient cultural familiarity. Using probability sample data from the 2023 Pew Research Center Survey of Religion and Spirituality in East Asian Societies across Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Japan, I test whether the multiple religious belief pattern holds under more precise operationalization. When replicating the GES approach using cultural attachment items, the familiar pattern reproduces. When instead examining active devotion to specific deities, prevalence drops substantially, most sharply among Christians and religious nones, though the extent varies across societies. Comparing cultural attachment to religious belief is comparing apples to oranges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70086
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Apples and Oranges: Exaggerated Multiple Religious Belief in East Asia

Ruiqian Li
1 citations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Cultural Differences and Values
11.73
article

Apples and Oranges: Exaggerated Multiple Religious Belief in East Asia

Ruiqian Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent scholarship proposes that East Asians commonly hold multiple religious beliefs simultaneously, even when they report a single religious identity or none at all. This note argues that this claim is substantially exaggerated due to a measurement mismatch: What Global East Survey (GES)‐based studies operationalize as religious belief is better understood as ambient cultural familiarity. Using probability sample data from the 2023 Pew Research Center Survey of Religion and Spirituality in East Asian Societies across Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Japan, I test whether the multiple religious belief pattern holds under more precise operationalization. When replicating the GES approach using cultural attachment items, the familiar pattern reproduces. When instead examining active devotion to specific deities, prevalence drops substantially, most sharply among Christians and religious nones, though the extent varies across societies. Comparing cultural attachment to religious belief is comparing apples to oranges.

Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
American University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Cultural Differences and Values
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.