A New CA19-9 Cutoff Value Identifies Lewis Antigen Status and Refines Prognostic Stratification in PDAC
PURPOSE: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) has limited utility in the ∼10% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who are Lewis-negative CA19-9 "nonproducers" (FUT3-null). This study aims to define the prognosis of FUT3-null PDAC and establish a CA19-9 cutoff that can help identify this subgroup in clinical practice. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Germline whole-exome sequencing was performed in a multicenter cohort of 615 patients with PDAC to determine FUT2/FUT3 genotypes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified the optimal CA19-9 cutoff for FUT3-null status. Maximally selected rank statistics were used to derive CA19-9 cutoffs that best stratified overall survival (OS) in a training set (n = 307) and were tested in a validation set (n = 308). RESULTS: FUT3-null patients had similar demographics except for a lower median baseline CA19-9 level (2.4 vs. 496 U/mL in FUT3-intact patients) and a comparable median OS (13.5 months) to FUT3-intact patients with CA19-9 >200 U/mL (12.9 months). ROC analysis identified 7 U/mL as the optimal CA19-9 cutoff for FUT3-null (positive predictive value 95.1%; accuracy 87.9%). Using CA19-9 cutoffs of 7 and 200 U/mL (without genotyping), patients were stratified into four prognostic groups: >7 to 37 U/mL (median OS, 23.2 months), >37 to 200 U/mL (median OS, 22 months), >200 U/mL (median OS, 12.8 months), and ≤7 U/mL (likely FUT3-null; median OS, 13.5 months; P < 0.001). Findings were consistent in multivariable Cox models. CONCLUSIONS: CA19-9 nonproducers whose outcomes are comparable with those with CA19-9 >200 U/mL represent a high-risk subgroup. CA19-9 ≤7 U/mL is a practical surrogate for identifying these patients. When genotyping is unavailable, a dual-threshold model (≤7 and >200 U/mL) improves risk stratification.
Authors
- An-Fu Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9591-1787)
- Jeng‐Shiun Du (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7311-4979)
- Shih‐Chang Chuang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1481-1632)
- Ying‐Jui Chao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-4702)
- S A Chen
- Siao Muk Cheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8145-4220)
- Daw‐Yang Hwang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5139-3612)
- Chih-Chuan Yu
- Y S. Su
- Chia‐Ming Yeh
- Li-Tzong Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3250-7167)
- Hui-Jen Tsai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5246-5748)
- Yan-Shen Shan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-5189)
- Ya-Chin Hou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9918-9568)
- Chih-Jung Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7625-2891)
- Nai-Jung Chiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9292-0055)
- Che-Wei Hsu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6742-9835)
- Chia-Jui Yen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8744-6248)
Institutions
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
- National Health Research Institutes (TW)
- National Tsing Hua University (TW)
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
- Chi Mei Medical Center (TW)
- National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
- National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2026-05-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4564
- Primary Topic
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
- Kaohsiung Medical University
- National Health Research Institutes