Personal variation in the palatability and side effects of liquid clindamycin among children

BACKGROUND: To assess a framework for pediatric medication acceptance evaluation while measuring variability in the taste of liquid clindamycin and the occurrence of side effects. METHODS: Children receiving their first clindamycin prescription and a caregiver participated in a prospective cohort study. After practicing using the hedonic-face scale to rate water, we videotaped children rating clindamycin palatability immediately, 5-, and 10-min post-swallow. Recordings were coded for behavioral responses. Caregivers rated children's acceptance on test day and at treatment end and completed daily diaries and an exit interview on adherence, side effects, and clinical outcomes. Genome-wide genotyping probed whether genetic ancestry and selected candidate genetic variants were associated with taste ratings and side effects. RESULTS: While only 2% (1/67) disliked water, 54% (36/67) disliked the taste of clindamycin immediately post-swallow and were more likely to display facial expressions of distaste (p < 0.001). Child and caregiver ratings moderately agreed (κ = 0.51). Side effects occurred in 36% (24/67) of children. Hedonic ratings and side effects did not differ significantly by genetic ancestry or associate with TAS2R38 rs713598 or TRPA1 rs11988795 genotypes. CONCLUSION: This study highlights substantial variability in pediatric medicine palatability and side effects and introduces a validated framework for assessing individual differences. IMPACT: We developed a validated framework to document individual differences in medication palatability, side effects, and caregiver perceptions and practices in both remote and onsite settings. There was substantial variability in hedonic ratings of palatability and side effects of clindamycin used for standard of care treatment in children. Hedonic ratings and side effects did not differ significantly by genetic ancestry or associate with TAS2R38 rs713598 or TRPA1 rs11988795 genotypes. We introduce a new framework for assessing individual differences in palatability for liquid pediatric medicines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Research
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-026-04953-1
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personal variation in the palatability and side effects of liquid clindamycin among children

Julie A. Mennella, Blanca E. Himes, Elizabeth D. Lowenthal, Mengyuan Kan et al.
Pediatric Research
Language Development and Disorders
article

Personal variation in the palatability and side effects of liquid clindamycin among children

Julie A. Mennella, Blanca E. Himes, Elizabeth D. Lowenthal, Mengyuan Kan, Elena Tsemberis, Erin Hyer, Robert W. Grundmeier, Christopher Hoffman, Francis Balamuth, Jacqueline Blum, Jennifer R Chapman
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess a framework for pediatric medication acceptance evaluation while measuring variability in the taste of liquid clindamycin and the occurrence of side effects. METHODS: Children receiving their first clindamycin prescription and a caregiver participated in a prospective cohort study. After practicing using the hedonic-face scale to rate water, we videotaped children rating clindamycin palatability immediately, 5-, and 10-min post-swallow. Recordings were coded for behavioral responses. Caregivers rated children's acceptance on test day and at treatment end and completed daily diaries and an exit interview on adherence, side effects, and clinical outcomes. Genome-wide genotyping probed whether genetic ancestry and selected candidate genetic variants were associated with taste ratings and side effects. RESULTS: While only 2% (1/67) disliked water, 54% (36/67) disliked the taste of clindamycin immediately post-swallow and were more likely to display facial expressions of distaste (p < 0.001). Child and caregiver ratings moderately agreed (κ = 0.51). Side effects occurred in 36% (24/67) of children. Hedonic ratings and side effects did not differ significantly by genetic ancestry or associate with TAS2R38 rs713598 or TRPA1 rs11988795 genotypes. CONCLUSION: This study highlights substantial variability in pediatric medicine palatability and side effects and introduces a validated framework for assessing individual differences. IMPACT: We developed a validated framework to document individual differences in medication palatability, side effects, and caregiver perceptions and practices in both remote and onsite settings. There was substantial variability in hedonic ratings of palatability and side effects of clindamycin used for standard of care treatment in children. Hedonic ratings and side effects did not differ significantly by genetic ancestry or associate with TAS2R38 rs713598 or TRPA1 rs11988795 genotypes. We introduce a new framework for assessing individual differences in palatability for liquid pediatric medicines.

Pediatric Research
National Institutes of Health (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Monell Chemical Senses Center (US), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.