The role of AI-mediated metacognitive interventions in EFL writing development: A cross-sectional study of textual accuracy, lexical sophistication, and cohesion

This paper examines the role of generative AI support in enhancing the quality of English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) writing in Chinese higher education by enhancing the metacognitive control of the learners in real coursework. Based on self-regulated learning, feedback intervention theory and technology acceptance, we suggest two AI-related intervention levers, AI-mediated metacognitive strategy use (AIM-SU) and AI feedback engagement (AI-FE), to modify three objective outcomes in writing (textual accuracy, lexical sophistication, cohesion) through metacognitive monitoring and regulation in writing (MMRW), where the acceptance of AI tools (ATA) moderates the IV -MMRW connections. Using a cross-sectional, non-experimental design, the study collected course-based essay analytics and survey responses from undergraduate EFL students in six cities in China (N = 448). . The quality of essays was evaluated based on the known text-analytic indices (accuracy: density of errors and error-free ratio; lexical sophistication: MTLD/HD-D and frequency-band coverage; cohesion: TAACO/Coh-Metrix indices). AIM-SU (formative), AI-FE, MMRW and ATA (reflective) were assessed by survey. Bootstrapping was used to test the measurement model (reliability/validity and formative diagnostics), and the structural model (direct, indirect, and moderated effects). Findings indicate that both AIM-SU and AI-FE were positively associated with all writing outcomes, while MMRW showed significant positive associations with textual accuracy, lexical sophistication, and cohesion and significantly mediated both AI-related pathways. . ATA helps a lot to enhance both AI-lever→MMRW, which indicates that acceptance conditions shift AI use to strategic metacognitive regulation instead of superficial editing. Results provide a process description of how AI-assisted writing promotion works and suggest that training must form an explicit scaffolding of goal set, criterion spectrally tracked monitors, and responsible feedback receipt during training when incorporating generative AI in EFL writing classes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107069
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of AI-mediated metacognitive interventions in EFL writing development: A cross-sectional study of textual accuracy, lexical sophistication, and cohesion

Kunming Fan, Ting Gao
Acta Psychologica
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

The role of AI-mediated metacognitive interventions in EFL writing development: A cross-sectional study of textual accuracy, lexical sophistication, and cohesion

Kunming Fan, Ting Gao
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the role of generative AI support in enhancing the quality of English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) writing in Chinese higher education by enhancing the metacognitive control of the learners in real coursework. Based on self-regulated learning, feedback intervention theory and technology acceptance, we suggest two AI-related intervention levers, AI-mediated metacognitive strategy use (AIM-SU) and AI feedback engagement (AI-FE), to modify three objective outcomes in writing (textual accuracy, lexical sophistication, cohesion) through metacognitive monitoring and regulation in writing (MMRW), where the acceptance of AI tools (ATA) moderates the IV -MMRW connections. Using a cross-sectional, non-experimental design, the study collected course-based essay analytics and survey responses from undergraduate EFL students in six cities in China (N = 448). . The quality of essays was evaluated based on the known text-analytic indices (accuracy: density of errors and error-free ratio; lexical sophistication: MTLD/HD-D and frequency-band coverage; cohesion: TAACO/Coh-Metrix indices). AIM-SU (formative), AI-FE, MMRW and ATA (reflective) were assessed by survey. Bootstrapping was used to test the measurement model (reliability/validity and formative diagnostics), and the structural model (direct, indirect, and moderated effects). Findings indicate that both AIM-SU and AI-FE were positively associated with all writing outcomes, while MMRW showed significant positive associations with textual accuracy, lexical sophistication, and cohesion and significantly mediated both AI-related pathways. . ATA helps a lot to enhance both AI-lever→MMRW, which indicates that acceptance conditions shift AI use to strategic metacognitive regulation instead of superficial editing. Results provide a process description of how AI-assisted writing promotion works and suggest that training must form an explicit scaffolding of goal set, criterion spectrally tracked monitors, and responsible feedback receipt during training when incorporating generative AI in EFL writing classes.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 267
Shenzhen University (CN), Shenzhen Technology University (CN), Hubei University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.